RGAGX vs. FDMO

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

RGAGX (American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6) and FDMO (Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF) are both funds - RGAGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by American Funds, while FDMO is a Momentum fund tracking the Fidelity U.S. Momentum Factor Index. RGAGX is actively managed, while FDMO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RGAGX returned 11.17%/yr vs 15.56%/yr for FDMO. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RGAGX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FDMO.

Performance

RGAGX vs. FDMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX) and Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGAGX achieves a 6.52% return, which is significantly lower than FDMO's 13.91% return.

RGAGX

• 1D: -2.18%
• 1M: -0.23%
• YTD: 6.52%
• 6M: 5.31%
• 1Y: 18.42%
• 3Y*: 23.41%
• 5Y*: 11.17%
• 10Y*: 16.44%

FDMO

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 1.67%
• YTD: 13.91%
• 6M: 11.69%
• 1Y: 28.77%
• 3Y*: 27.46%
• 5Y*: 15.56%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGAGX vs. FDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RGAGX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6	6.52%	20.08%	28.41%	37.66%	-30.53%	19.67%	38.30%	29.22%	-2.88%	26.53%
FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF	13.91%	21.43%	32.78%	24.79%	-19.32%	22.23%	21.71%	25.29%	-4.13%	23.93%

Correlation

The correlation between RGAGX and FDMO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016	0.92

The correlation between RGAGX and FDMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RGAGX vs. FDMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGAGX

RGAGX Risk / Return Rank: 23
RGAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
RGAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
RGAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
RGAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
RGAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 26

FDMO

FDMO Risk / Return Rank: 53
FDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
FDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
FDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 50
FDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
FDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGAGX vs. FDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX) and Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RGAGX	FDMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	1.62	-0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	2.22	-0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.29	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.50	2.37	-0.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.73	9.22	-3.48

RGAGX vs. FDMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the FDMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGAGX and FDMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RGAGX vs. FDMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGAGX drawdown since its inception was -36.19%, which is greater than FDMO's maximum drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGAGX and FDMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGAGX	FDMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.19%	-33.94%	-2.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.71%	-12.22%	-1.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.54%	-21.88%	+0.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.19%	-25.44%	-10.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.69%	-3.26%	-0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.48%	-5.40%	-0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.58%	3.13%	+0.45%

Volatility

RGAGX vs. FDMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX) is 7.15%, while Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) has a volatility of 7.78%. This indicates that RGAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RGAGX	FDMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.15%	7.78%	-0.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.16%	14.53%	-1.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.43%	17.86%	-1.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.45%	19.25%	+1.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.75%	19.58%	+0.17%

RGAGX vs. FDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGAGX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FDMO's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

RGAGX vs. FDMO - Dividend Comparison

RGAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.32%, more than FDMO's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF	0.60%	0.61%	0.90%	0.87%	1.19%	0.60%	0.77%	1.23%	1.22%	1.09%	0.45%	0.00%
RGAGX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6	10.32%	10.99%	9.29%	7.70%	4.44%	8.49%	4.57%	7.93%	12.36%	7.34%	6.95%	9.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGAGX and FDMO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, RGAGX and FDMO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RGAGX or FDMO?

FDMO has higher volatility (7.78%) compared to RGAGX (7.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGAGX dropped -36.19% vs FDMO's -33.94%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.