PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGAGX vs. AMHIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RGAGX vs. AMHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund (AMHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGAGX achieves a 10.24% return, which is significantly higher than AMHIX's 2.23% return. Over the past 10 years, RGAGX has outperformed AMHIX with an annualized return of 16.39%, while AMHIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.29% annualized return.


RGAGX

1D
-0.33%
1M
6.84%
YTD
10.24%
6M
9.86%
1Y
26.58%
3Y*
25.54%
5Y*
12.86%
10Y*
16.39%

AMHIX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.97%
YTD
2.23%
6M
2.71%
1Y
8.39%
3Y*
6.13%
5Y*
1.74%
10Y*
3.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGAGX vs. AMHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RGAGX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6
10.24%20.08%28.41%37.66%-30.53%19.67%38.30%29.22%-2.88%26.53%
AMHIX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund
2.23%5.70%6.19%7.18%-12.59%5.28%4.39%8.88%1.59%8.89%

Correlation

The correlation between RGAGX and AMHIX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2009

-0.07

The correlation between RGAGX and AMHIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.13 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGAGX vs. AMHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGAGX
RGAGX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
RGAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
RGAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

AMHIX
AMHIX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
AMHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AMHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGAGX vs. AMHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund (AMHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RGAGXAMHIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.80

2.77

-0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.46

4.49

-2.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.67

-0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

3.02

-1.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.76

10.73

-2.96

RGAGX vs. AMHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is lower than the AMHIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGAGX and AMHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RGAGXAMHIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

2.77

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.36

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.73

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

1.40

-0.55

Drawdowns

RGAGX vs. AMHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGAGX drawdown since its inception was -36.19%, which is greater than AMHIX's maximum drawdown of -21.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGAGX and AMHIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGAGXAMHIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.19%

-21.74%

-14.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.71%

-2.76%

-10.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.54%

-6.25%

-15.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.19%

-17.81%

-18.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.19%

-17.81%

-18.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-0.02%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.49%

-2.12%

-3.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

0.78%

+2.72%

Volatility

RGAGX vs. AMHIX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund (AMHIX) at 1.10%. This indicates that RGAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGAGXAMHIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.69%

1.10%

+2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.65%

2.20%

+9.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.15%

3.03%

+12.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.25%

4.84%

+15.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.69%

4.53%

+15.16%

RGAGX vs. AMHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGAGX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than AMHIX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

RGAGX vs. AMHIX - Dividend Comparison

RGAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.97%, more than AMHIX's 3.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMHIX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund
3.88%5.26%3.80%3.10%2.53%3.23%3.40%3.46%3.67%4.01%3.55%4.03%
RGAGX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6
9.97%10.99%9.29%7.70%4.44%8.49%4.57%7.93%12.36%7.34%6.95%9.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


RGAGX and AMHIX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RGAGX has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to AMHIX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGAGX dropped -36.19% vs AMHIX's -21.74%.

AMHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGAGX and AMHIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer