RFNGX vs. SWLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about American Funds Fundamental Investors Fund Class R6 (RFNGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).
RFNGX is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on May 1, 2009. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
RFNGX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RFNGX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFNGX American Funds Fundamental Investors Fund Class R6 | -6.06% | 24.58% | 22.77% | 26.25% | -16.38% | 22.83% | 13.72% | 27.48% | -7.09% | -0.22% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -13.06% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFNGX achieves a -6.06% return, which is significantly higher than SWLGX's -13.06% return.
RFNGX
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -9.87%
- YTD
- -6.06%
- 6M
- -1.96%
- 1Y
- 20.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.60%
- 5Y*
- 11.85%
- 10Y*
- 13.18%
SWLGX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -12.07%
- 1Y
- 14.45%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFNGX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFNGX has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RFNGX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
RFNGX
SWLGX
RFNGX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Fundamental Investors Fund Class R6 (RFNGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFNGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 0.66 | +0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.78 | 1.10 | +0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.15 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 0.72 | +0.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.35 | 2.51 | +4.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFNGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 0.66 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.56 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.68 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between RFNGX and SWLGX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RFNGX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
RFNGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.43%, more than SWLGX's 0.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFNGX American Funds Fundamental Investors Fund Class R6 | 9.43% | 8.82% | 8.91% | 6.10% | 5.33% | 11.29% | 1.77% | 7.21% | 10.67% | 7.56% | 5.01% | 6.01% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.52% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RFNGX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFNGX drawdown since its inception was -33.90%, roughly equal to the maximum SWLGX drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFNGX and SWLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFNGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.90% | -32.69% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.35% | -16.16% | +4.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.88% | -32.69% | +7.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.62% | -16.16% | +5.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.05% | -7.13% | +3.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 4.62% | -2.09% |
Volatility
RFNGX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Funds Fundamental Investors Fund Class R6 (RFNGX) is 4.97%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that RFNGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RFNGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.97% | 5.38% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.65% | 11.82% | -1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.94% | 22.31% | -4.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 21.47% | -4.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.66% | 22.78% | -5.12% |