PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFMZ vs. EIM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RFMZ vs. EIM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund II Inc. (RFMZ) and Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund (EIM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RFMZ vs. EIM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RFMZ
RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund II Inc.
1.79%2.22%10.11%4.54%-26.41%3.62%
EIM
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund
1.96%-0.08%8.21%1.66%-19.82%6.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFMZ achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly lower than EIM's 1.96% return.


RFMZ

1D
2.10%
1M
-3.42%
YTD
1.79%
6M
0.72%
1Y
1.97%
3Y*
5.62%
5Y*
-1.89%
10Y*

EIM

1D
2.52%
1M
-2.19%
YTD
1.96%
6M
1.36%
1Y
4.29%
3Y*
3.48%
5Y*
-1.10%
10Y*
1.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RFMZ vs. EIM - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFMZ has a 3.27% expense ratio, which is higher than EIM's 0.01% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RFMZ vs. EIM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFMZ
RFMZ Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
RFMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
RFMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

EIM
EIM Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
EIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIM Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
EIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIM Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFMZ vs. EIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund II Inc. (RFMZ) and Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund (EIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RFMZEIMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.19

0.43

-0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.32

0.70

-0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.09

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.18

0.67

-0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.51

1.41

-0.90

RFMZ vs. EIM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFMZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the EIM Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFMZ and EIM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RFMZEIMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

0.43

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

-0.10

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.13

0.26

-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between RFMZ and EIM is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

RFMZ vs. EIM - Dividend Comparison

RFMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.01%, more than EIM's 6.24% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RFMZ
RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund II Inc.
8.01%8.13%7.76%7.92%8.53%4.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EIM
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund
6.24%6.27%5.65%4.07%4.87%4.38%4.29%4.00%4.98%5.48%5.64%5.90%

Drawdowns

RFMZ vs. EIM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFMZ drawdown since its inception was -39.28%, smaller than the maximum EIM drawdown of -52.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFMZ and EIM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RFMZEIMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.28%

-52.50%

+13.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.48%

-6.76%

-2.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.28%

-31.69%

-7.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.33%

-11.10%

-7.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.44%

-8.36%

-12.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

3.20%

+0.20%

Volatility

RFMZ vs. EIM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RiverNorth Flexible Municipal Income Fund II Inc. (RFMZ) is 3.29%, while Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund (EIM) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that RFMZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RFMZEIMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

3.61%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.12%

5.10%

+1.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.23%

9.98%

+0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.63%

10.60%

+3.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.52%

11.52%

+2.00%