PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIM vs. BSNIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIM vs. BSNIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund (EIM) and Baird Strategic Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (BSNIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIM achieves a 1.85% return, which is significantly higher than BSNIX's 0.42% return.


EIM

1D
-0.52%
1M
-3.62%
6M
-0.71%
YTD
1.85%
1Y
5.70%
3Y*
4.56%
5Y*
-2.18%
10Y*
1.15%
ALL TIME*
4.27%

BSNIX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.93%
6M
-0.32%
YTD
0.42%
1Y
3.83%
3Y*
4.00%
5Y*
1.95%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$1.52M$1.46M$1.31M

EIM vs. BSNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EIM
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund
1.85%-0.08%8.21%1.66%-19.82%4.35%10.53%0.67%
BSNIX
Baird Strategic Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class
0.42%4.90%3.17%6.78%-5.31%2.26%8.39%0.88%

Correlation

The correlation between EIM and BSNIX is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2019

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIM vs. BSNIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EIM
EIM Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
EIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIM Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
EIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIM Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

BSNIX
BSNIX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
BSNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
BSNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EIM vs. BSNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund (EIM) and Baird Strategic Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (BSNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EIMBSNIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.61

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

2.04

-0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.35

6.77

-4.42

EIM vs. BSNIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIM Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the BSNIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIM and BSNIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EIM vs. BSNIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIM drawdown since its inception was -52.50%, which is greater than BSNIX's maximum drawdown of -9.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIM and BSNIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIMBSNIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.50%

-9.58%

-42.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.30%

-2.09%

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.57%

-2.91%

-8.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.69%

-9.58%

-22.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.20%

-1.28%

-9.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.38%

-1.48%

-6.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

0.63%

+1.99%

Volatility

EIM vs. BSNIX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund (EIM) has a higher volatility of 2.45% compared to Baird Strategic Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (BSNIX) at 0.66%. This indicates that EIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSNIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIMBSNIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.45%

0.66%

+1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.47%

1.44%

+5.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.46%

1.75%

+7.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.77%

2.70%

+8.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.51%

3.34%

+8.17%

EIM vs. BSNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIM has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than BSNIX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIM vs. BSNIX - Dividend Comparison

EIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.38%, more than BSNIX's 3.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSNIX
Baird Strategic Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class
3.01%3.29%3.51%3.22%2.09%1.58%2.23%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EIM
Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund
6.38%6.27%5.65%4.07%4.87%4.38%4.29%4.00%4.98%5.48%5.64%5.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIM and BSNIX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EIM has higher volatility (2.45%) compared to BSNIX (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIM dropped -52.50% vs BSNIX's -9.58%.

BSNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIM and BSNIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer