RMMZ vs. MMU
RMMZ (RiverNorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund II Inc.) and MMU (Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, RMMZ returned 7.16%/yr vs 7.38%/yr for MMU. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RMMZ vs. MMU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMMZ achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly higher than MMU's 0.21% return.
RMMZ
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 5.04%
- 6M
- 4.28%
- 1Y
- 11.30%
- 3Y*
- 7.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MMU
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 1.34%
- YTD
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 0.64%
- 1Y
- 10.96%
- 3Y*
- 7.38%
- 5Y*
- -0.45%
- 10Y*
- 1.28%
RMMZ vs. MMU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMMZ RiverNorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund II Inc. | 5.04% | 4.99% | 2.72% | 11.22% | -12.90% |
MMU Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc | 0.21% | 9.19% | 6.58% | 5.63% | -13.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between RMMZ and MMU is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2022 | 0.35 |
The correlation between RMMZ and MMU shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.37 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RMMZ vs. MMU — Risk / Return Rank
RMMZ
MMU
RMMZ vs. MMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverNorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund II Inc. (RMMZ) and Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc (MMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMMZ | MMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.26 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 1.87 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.96 | 6.56 | -0.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMMZ | MMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 1.33 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.37 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
RMMZ vs. MMU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMMZ drawdown since its inception was -27.15%, smaller than the maximum MMU drawdown of -34.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMMZ and MMU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMMZ | MMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.15% | -34.51% | +7.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.58% | -5.88% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.77% | -12.86% | -5.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -6.81% | +5.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.67% | -6.83% | -2.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 1.68% | +0.22% |
Volatility
RMMZ vs. MMU - Volatility Comparison
RiverNorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund II Inc. (RMMZ) has a higher volatility of 2.73% compared to Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc (MMU) at 2.39%. This indicates that RMMZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RMMZ | MMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.73% | 2.39% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.53% | 7.10% | +0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.11% | 8.31% | +1.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 10.68% | +6.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 13.01% | +4.40% |
Dividends
RMMZ vs. MMU - Dividend Comparison
RMMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.51%, more than MMU's 6.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMU Western Asset Managed Municipals Fund Inc | 6.42% | 6.26% | 6.16% | 4.36% | 4.65% | 3.88% | 4.21% | 4.96% | 5.68% | 5.37% | 5.67% | 5.50% |
RMMZ RiverNorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund II Inc. | 7.51% | 7.86% | 7.82% | 7.45% | 6.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RMMZ and MMU have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RMMZ has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to MMU (2.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMMZ dropped -27.15% vs MMU's -34.51%.
MMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RMMZ and MMU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer