PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFLR vs. BAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RFLR vs. BAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF (RFLR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RFLR vs. BAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
RFLR
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF
2.14%11.81%2.29%
BAPR
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April
2.08%8.28%4.04%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RFLR having a 2.14% return and BAPR slightly lower at 2.08%.


RFLR

1D
1.68%
1M
-2.02%
YTD
2.14%
6M
5.03%
1Y
22.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BAPR

1D
2.58%
1M
0.99%
YTD
2.08%
6M
4.42%
1Y
15.33%
3Y*
13.43%
5Y*
10.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RFLR vs. BAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than BAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RFLR vs. BAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFLR
RFLR Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
RFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
RFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

BAPR
BAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
BAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFLR vs. BAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF (RFLR) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RFLRBAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.84

1.29

+0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.62

1.99

+0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.40

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.77

1.74

+2.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.40

11.59

+0.82

RFLR vs. BAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFLR Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the BAPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFLR and BAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RFLRBAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

1.29

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.75

+0.12

Correlation

The correlation between RFLR and BAPR is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

RFLR vs. BAPR - Dividend Comparison

RFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, while BAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

RFLR vs. BAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFLR drawdown since its inception was -15.48%, smaller than the maximum BAPR drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFLR and BAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RFLRBAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.48%

-23.91%

+8.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.79%

-9.19%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.10%

0.00%

-3.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.21%

-2.66%

-1.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

1.38%

+0.38%

Volatility

RFLR vs. BAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Small Cap Managed Floor ETF (RFLR) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) at 3.45%. This indicates that RFLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RFLRBAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

3.45%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.65%

4.26%

+5.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.21%

11.90%

+0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.34%

11.54%

+0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.34%

13.25%

-0.91%