PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFKTX vs. FIRQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFKTX vs. FIRQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds 2055 Target Date Retirement Fund Class R6 (RFKTX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund (FIRQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RFKTX

1D
-1.20%
1M
0.37%
6M
6.32%
YTD
9.42%
1Y
18.59%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
9.44%
10Y*
11.99%

FIRQX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFKTX vs. FIRQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFKTX
American Funds 2055 Target Date Retirement Fund Class R6
9.42%20.76%15.58%21.41%-19.48%17.33%19.41%25.06%-5.64%22.63%
FIRQX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund
3.60%9.97%4.48%8.52%-12.39%3.82%9.59%12.62%-2.83%10.63%

Correlation

The correlation between RFKTX and FIRQX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011

0.86

The correlation between RFKTX and FIRQX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (3 years) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFKTX vs. FIRQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFKTX
RFKTX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
RFKTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFKTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFKTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
RFKTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFKTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

FIRQX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFKTX vs. FIRQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds 2055 Target Date Retirement Fund Class R6 (RFKTX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund (FIRQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RFKTXFIRQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.61

RFKTX vs. FIRQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RFKTX vs. FIRQX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFKTXFIRQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

Volatility

RFKTX vs. FIRQX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFKTXFIRQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.03%

RFKTX vs. FIRQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFKTX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FIRQX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFKTX vs. FIRQX - Dividend Comparison

RFKTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.41%, more than FIRQX's 3.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIRQX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund
3.17%3.14%2.95%2.75%5.01%6.00%3.50%3.15%5.59%16.31%2.43%4.08%
RFKTX
American Funds 2055 Target Date Retirement Fund Class R6
5.41%5.92%3.49%2.50%7.19%4.41%3.22%4.18%4.77%2.43%3.45%4.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


RFKTX and FIRQX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFKTX and FIRQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer