RFIX vs. HIGH
RFIX (Simplify Bond Bull ETF) and HIGH (Simplify Enhanced Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RFIX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify, while HIGH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RFIX returned -15.77% vs -1.25% for HIGH. Their 0.02 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
RFIX vs. HIGH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFIX achieves a 4.85% return, which is significantly higher than HIGH's -1.00% return.
RFIX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- 6M
- 5.09%
- YTD
- 4.85%
- 1Y
- -15.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -22.51%
HIGH
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- -1.00%
- 1Y
- -1.25%
- 3Y*
- 2.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.43%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $264.89K | $245.02K | $537.34K | |
| $6.74M | $8.71M | $16.93M |
RFIX vs. HIGH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RFIX Simplify Bond Bull ETF | 4.85% | -28.43% | -12.22% |
HIGH Simplify Enhanced Income ETF | -1.00% | 4.35% | -2.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between RFIX and HIGH is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2024 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RFIX vs. HIGH — Risk / Return Rank
RFIX
HIGH
RFIX vs. HIGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Bond Bull ETF (RFIX) and Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RFIX | HIGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.97 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.68 | -0.21 | -0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | -0.34 | -0.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RFIX vs. HIGH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFIX drawdown since its inception was -38.79%, which is greater than HIGH's maximum drawdown of -9.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFIX and HIGH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFIX | HIGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.79% | -9.50% | -29.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.63% | -7.08% | -14.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.21% | -7.69% | -26.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.89% | -2.59% | -22.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.18% | 4.46% | +7.72% |
Volatility
RFIX vs. HIGH - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Bond Bull ETF (RFIX) has a higher volatility of 6.23% compared to Simplify Enhanced Income ETF (HIGH) at 2.16%. This indicates that RFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HIGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RFIX | HIGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.23% | 2.16% | +4.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.46% | 3.90% | +16.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.41% | 7.23% | +22.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.63% | 9.46% | +21.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.63% | 9.46% | +21.17% |
RFIX vs. HIGH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RFIX and HIGH have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
RFIX vs. HIGH - Dividend Comparison
RFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, less than HIGH's 6.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIGH Simplify Enhanced Income ETF | 6.88% | 7.71% | 8.34% | 9.40% | 0.62% |
RFIX Simplify Bond Bull ETF | 4.36% | 5.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RFIX and HIGH have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RFIX has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to HIGH (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFIX dropped -38.79% vs HIGH's -9.50%.
On 1-year performance, HIGH leads with -1.25% vs -15.77% for RFIX. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, HIGH has been the lower-risk option at 2.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HIGH has performed better with a -1.25% return vs -15.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RFIX and HIGH have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
HIGH has the higher dividend yield at 6.88%, compared with 4.36% for RFIX.
RFIX is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while HIGH is Derivative Income.
HIGH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.21 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RFIX and HIGH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer