RFIX vs. FTBD
RFIX (Simplify Bond Bull ETF) and FTBD (Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RFIX returned -14.76% vs 6.48% for FTBD. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RFIX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for FTBD.
Performance
RFIX vs. FTBD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFIX achieves a 7.97% return, which is significantly higher than FTBD's 0.99% return.
RFIX
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -2.56%
- YTD
- 7.97%
- 6M
- -2.48%
- 1Y
- -14.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTBD
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 6.48%
- 3Y*
- 5.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RFIX vs. FTBD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RFIX Simplify Bond Bull ETF | 7.97% | -28.43% | -12.32% |
FTBD Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF | 0.99% | 8.35% | -2.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between RFIX and FTBD is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2024 | 0.64 |
The correlation between RFIX and FTBD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RFIX vs. FTBD — Risk / Return Rank
RFIX
FTBD
RFIX vs. FTBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Bond Bull ETF (RFIX) and Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF (FTBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFIX | FTBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.27 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 2.18 | -2.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | 7.50 | -8.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFIX | FTBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 | 1.51 | -2.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.76 | 0.75 | -1.51 |
Drawdowns
RFIX vs. FTBD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFIX drawdown since its inception was -38.79%, which is greater than FTBD's maximum drawdown of -6.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFIX and FTBD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFIX | FTBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.79% | -6.98% | -31.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.48% | -2.98% | -22.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.25% | -1.15% | -31.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.11% | -1.57% | -22.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.70% | 0.87% | +13.83% |
Volatility
RFIX vs. FTBD - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Bond Bull ETF (RFIX) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF (FTBD) at 1.47%. This indicates that RFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTBD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RFIX | FTBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.47% | 1.47% | +4.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.35% | 3.17% | +17.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.75% | 4.32% | +25.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.90% | 5.87% | +25.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.90% | 5.87% | +25.03% |
RFIX vs. FTBD - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FTBD's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
RFIX vs. FTBD - Dividend Comparison
RFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, less than FTBD's 5.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTBD Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF | 5.03% | 5.04% | 4.76% | 4.69% |
RFIX Simplify Bond Bull ETF | 4.63% | 5.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RFIX and FTBD have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RFIX has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to FTBD (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFIX dropped -38.79% vs FTBD's -6.98%.
On 1-year performance, FTBD leads with 6.48% vs -14.76% for RFIX. On fees, RFIX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FTBD has been the lower-risk option at 1.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FTBD has performed better with a 6.48% return vs -14.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RFIX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FTBD.
FTBD has the higher dividend yield at 5.03%, compared with 4.63% for RFIX.
They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RFIX and 0.55% for FTBD.
FTBD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RFIX and FTBD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer