RFISX vs. NESGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Ranger Small Cap Fund (RFISX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX).
RFISX is managed by Ranger Funds. It was launched on Sep 29, 2011. NESGX is managed by Needham. It was launched on May 22, 2002.
Performance
RFISX vs. NESGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RFISX vs. NESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFISX Ranger Small Cap Fund | -8.03% | -3.01% | 6.32% | 20.25% | -30.89% | 17.29% | 32.82% | 29.66% | -7.80% | 15.38% |
NESGX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund | 9.51% | 10.50% | 12.76% | 5.68% | -30.21% | 10.59% | 71.90% | 54.42% | -5.43% | 11.96% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFISX achieves a -8.03% return, which is significantly lower than NESGX's 9.51% return. Over the past 10 years, RFISX has underperformed NESGX with an annualized return of 7.33%, while NESGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.30% annualized return.
RFISX
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- -10.39%
- YTD
- -8.03%
- 6M
- -7.85%
- 1Y
- -1.88%
- 3Y*
- 1.31%
- 5Y*
- -2.53%
- 10Y*
- 7.33%
NESGX
- 1D
- -4.45%
- 1M
- -7.07%
- YTD
- 9.51%
- 6M
- 12.14%
- 1Y
- 47.82%
- 3Y*
- 10.96%
- 5Y*
- 0.71%
- 10Y*
- 14.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFISX vs. NESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFISX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is lower than NESGX's 1.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RFISX vs. NESGX — Risk / Return Rank
RFISX
NESGX
RFISX vs. NESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ranger Small Cap Fund (RFISX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFISX | NESGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | 1.32 | -1.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.02 | 1.88 | -1.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.25 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | 2.38 | -2.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 8.02 | -9.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFISX | NESGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 | 1.32 | -1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | 0.02 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.00 | 0.56 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.51 | -0.51 |
Correlation
The correlation between RFISX and NESGX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RFISX vs. NESGX - Dividend Comparison
RFISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.71%, while NESGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFISX Ranger Small Cap Fund | 11.71% | 10.77% | 0.00% | 6.35% | 3.76% | 10.05% | 6.71% | 6.62% | 16.25% | 8.08% | 9.32% | 6.87% |
NESGX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.16% | 25.09% | 13.69% | 8.43% | 22.26% | 8.94% | 6.67% | 2.52% |
Drawdowns
RFISX vs. NESGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFISX drawdown since its inception was -98.44%, which is greater than NESGX's maximum drawdown of -50.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFISX and NESGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFISX | NESGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.44% | -50.29% | -48.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.67% | -17.27% | +2.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.44% | -50.05% | -48.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.44% | -50.29% | -48.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.28% | -9.15% | -89.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.65% | -11.74% | -4.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | 5.13% | -0.94% |
Volatility
RFISX vs. NESGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ranger Small Cap Fund (RFISX) is 6.26%, while Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX) has a volatility of 10.96%. This indicates that RFISX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NESGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RFISX | NESGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.26% | 10.96% | -4.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.33% | 22.87% | -9.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.87% | 35.07% | -13.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2,192.05% | 29.08% | +2,162.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1,549.82% | 25.51% | +1,524.31% |