RFISX vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Ranger Small Cap Fund (RFISX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
RFISX is managed by Ranger Funds. It was launched on Sep 29, 2011. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010.
Performance
RFISX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RFISX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFISX Ranger Small Cap Fund | -8.03% | -3.01% | 6.32% | 20.25% | -30.89% | 17.29% | 32.82% | 29.66% | -7.80% | 15.38% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -3.66% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFISX achieves a -8.03% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's -3.66% return. Over the past 10 years, RFISX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 7.33%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.14% annualized return.
RFISX
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- -10.39%
- YTD
- -8.03%
- 6M
- -7.85%
- 1Y
- -1.88%
- 3Y*
- 1.31%
- 5Y*
- -2.53%
- 10Y*
- 7.33%
VOO
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -4.29%
- YTD
- -3.66%
- 6M
- -1.41%
- 1Y
- 18.17%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 11.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFISX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFISX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RFISX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
RFISX
VOO
RFISX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ranger Small Cap Fund (RFISX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFISX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | 1.01 | -1.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.02 | 1.53 | -1.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.23 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | 1.55 | -1.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 7.31 | -8.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFISX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 | 1.01 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | 0.71 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.00 | 0.79 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.83 | -0.83 |
Correlation
The correlation between RFISX and VOO is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RFISX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
RFISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.71%, more than VOO's 1.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFISX Ranger Small Cap Fund | 11.71% | 10.77% | 0.00% | 6.35% | 3.76% | 10.05% | 6.71% | 6.62% | 16.25% | 8.08% | 9.32% | 6.87% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.18% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
RFISX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFISX drawdown since its inception was -98.44%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFISX and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFISX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.44% | -33.99% | -64.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.67% | -11.98% | -2.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.44% | -24.52% | -73.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.44% | -33.99% | -64.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.28% | -5.55% | -92.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.65% | -3.72% | -12.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | 2.55% | +1.64% |
Volatility
RFISX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Ranger Small Cap Fund (RFISX) has a higher volatility of 6.26% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.34%. This indicates that RFISX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RFISX | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.26% | 5.34% | +0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.33% | 9.47% | +3.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.87% | 18.11% | +3.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2,192.05% | 16.82% | +2,175.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1,549.82% | 17.99% | +1,531.83% |