RFIL vs. APLD
RFIL (RF Industries, Ltd.) and APLD (Applied Digital Corporation) are both stocks. RFIL operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while APLD operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, RFIL returned 23.65%/yr vs 90.24%/yr for APLD. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RFIL vs. APLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFIL achieves a 215.74% return, which is significantly higher than APLD's 82.34% return. Over the past 10 years, RFIL has underperformed APLD with an annualized return of 23.65%, while APLD has yielded a comparatively higher 90.24% annualized return.
RFIL
- 1D
- -2.82%
- 1M
- 30.92%
- YTD
- 215.74%
- 6M
- 202.15%
- 1Y
- 349.51%
- 3Y*
- 59.59%
- 5Y*
- 18.05%
- 10Y*
- 23.65%
APLD
- 1D
- -6.58%
- 1M
- 25.48%
- YTD
- 82.34%
- 6M
- 52.28%
- 1Y
- 336.20%
- 3Y*
- 69.14%
- 5Y*
- 54.74%
- 10Y*
- 90.24%
RFIL vs. APLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFIL RF Industries, Ltd. | 215.74% | 47.83% | 28.62% | -40.86% | -35.75% | 62.93% | -27.00% | -5.84% | 172.35% | 60.88% |
APLD Applied Digital Corporation | 82.34% | 220.94% | 13.35% | 266.30% | -92.68% | 11,789.90% | 389.44% | -34.55% | 64.99% | -33.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between RFIL and APLD is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2008 | 0.06 |
Over the past year, RFIL and APLD have become more correlated (0.27) than their long-term average of 0.06, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
RFIL:
$195.93M
APLD:
$12.15B
RFIL:
$0.02
APLD:
-$0.72
RFIL:
2.46
APLD:
30.30
RFIL:
5.51
APLD:
7.71
RFIL:
$80.36M
APLD:
$390.57M
RFIL:
$25.70M
APLD:
$124.93M
RFIL:
$3.05M
APLD:
-$154.66M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RFIL vs. APLD — Risk / Return Rank
RFIL
APLD
RFIL vs. APLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) and Applied Digital Corporation (APLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFIL | APLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.38 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.94 | 6.73 | +2.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.19 | 15.32 | +3.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFIL | APLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.96 | 3.06 | +0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.38 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.40 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.05 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
RFIL vs. APLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFIL drawdown since its inception was -90.16%, smaller than the maximum APLD drawdown of -99.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFIL and APLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFIL | APLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.16% | -99.70% | +9.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.38% | -50.31% | +10.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.53% | -76.66% | +29.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.42% | -97.10% | +23.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.64% | -97.10% | +18.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.83% | -9.95% | +4.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.40% | -83.28% | +25.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.32% | 22.07% | -3.75% |
Volatility
RFIL vs. APLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) is 20.34%, while Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) has a volatility of 34.53%. This indicates that RFIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RFIL | APLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.34% | 34.53% | -14.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.46% | 79.55% | -12.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 89.11% | 110.57% | -21.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.67% | 145.02% | -89.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.05% | 295.29% | -237.24% |
Dividends
RFIL vs. APLD - Dividend Comparison
Neither RFIL nor APLD has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APLD Applied Digital Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RFIL RF Industries, Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.41% | 1.18% | 1.10% | 2.96% | 4.57% | 6.36% |
Financials
RFIL vs. APLD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RF Industries, Ltd. and Applied Digital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RFIL vs. APLD - Profitability Comparison
RFIL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RF Industries, Ltd. reported a gross profit of 6.12M and revenue of 18.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.3%.
APLD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Digital Corporation reported a gross profit of 82.52M and revenue of 161.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.0%.
RFIL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RF Industries, Ltd. reported an operating income of 177.00K and revenue of 18.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.9%.
APLD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Digital Corporation reported an operating income of -62.13M and revenue of 161.76M, resulting in an operating margin of -38.4%.
RFIL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RF Industries, Ltd. reported a net income of -50.00K and revenue of 18.97M, resulting in a net margin of -0.3%.
APLD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Digital Corporation reported a net income of -104.11M and revenue of 161.76M, resulting in a net margin of -64.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RFIL and APLD have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
APLD has higher volatility (34.53%) compared to RFIL (20.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFIL dropped -90.16% vs APLD's -99.70%.
RFIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.96 vs 3.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RFIL and APLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer