RFIL vs. ONEQ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ).

ONEQ is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ Composite Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2003.

Performance

RFIL vs. ONEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RFIL vs. ONEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RFIL RF Industries, Ltd.	78.37%	47.83%	28.62%	-40.86%	-35.75%	62.93%	-27.00%	-5.84%	172.35%	60.88%
ONEQ Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock	-6.77%	20.89%	29.30%	45.73%	-32.12%	22.11%	44.87%	38.01%	-3.18%	29.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFIL achieves a 78.37% return, which is significantly higher than ONEQ's -6.77% return. Over the past 10 years, RFIL has underperformed ONEQ with an annualized return of 15.95%, while ONEQ has yielded a comparatively higher 17.18% annualized return.

RFIL

• 1D: 5.74%
• 1M: -9.16%
• YTD: 78.37%
• 6M: 25.27%
• 1Y: 119.83%
• 3Y*: 32.82%
• 5Y*: 10.56%
• 10Y*: 15.95%

ONEQ

• 1D: 3.78%
• 1M: -4.49%
• YTD: -6.77%
• 6M: -4.24%
• 1Y: 25.78%
• 3Y*: 21.89%
• 5Y*: 11.02%
• 10Y*: 17.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RFIL vs. ONEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFIL

RFIL Risk / Return Rank: 82
RFIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
RFIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
RFIL Omega Ratio Rank: 78
RFIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
RFIL Martin Ratio Rank: 82

ONEQ

ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 72
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 71
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFIL vs. ONEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RFIL	ONEQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	1.12	+0.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	1.72	+0.48
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.25	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.23	1.95	+1.28
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.57	7.24	-0.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RFIL vs. ONEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFIL Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the ONEQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFIL and ONEQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RFIL	ONEQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.38	1.12	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19	0.50	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	0.80	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	0.60	-0.49

Correlation

The correlation between RFIL and ONEQ is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

RFIL vs. ONEQ - Dividend Comparison

RFIL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ONEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RFIL RF Industries, Ltd.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.41%	1.18%	1.10%	2.96%	4.57%	6.36%
ONEQ Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock	0.83%	0.54%	0.65%	0.71%	0.97%	0.54%	0.71%	2.51%	1.08%	0.84%	1.12%	1.04%

Drawdowns

RFIL vs. ONEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFIL drawdown since its inception was -90.16%, which is greater than ONEQ's maximum drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFIL and ONEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	RFIL	ONEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.16%	-55.09%	-35.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.38%	-13.13%	-26.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-73.42%	-35.23%	-38.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-78.64%	-35.23%	-43.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.48%	-9.34%	-12.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-57.72%	-8.01%	-49.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.35%	3.53%	+15.82%

Volatility

RFIL vs. ONEQ - Volatility Comparison

RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) has a higher volatility of 39.45% compared to Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ) at 6.93%. This indicates that RFIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ONEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RFIL	ONEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	39.45%	6.93%	+32.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	66.17%	12.90%	+53.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	87.32%	23.22%	+64.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	54.73%	22.16%	+32.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	57.74%	21.67%	+36.07%