PortfoliosLab logo
RFIL vs. ONEQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RFIL and ONEQ is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

RFIL vs. ONEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RFIL:

0.73

ONEQ:

0.54

Sortino Ratio

RFIL:

1.32

ONEQ:

0.92

Omega Ratio

RFIL:

1.16

ONEQ:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

RFIL:

0.51

ONEQ:

0.58

Martin Ratio

RFIL:

2.29

ONEQ:

1.88

Ulcer Index

RFIL:

16.29%

ONEQ:

7.44%

Daily Std Dev

RFIL:

53.24%

ONEQ:

26.11%

Max Drawdown

RFIL:

-90.15%

ONEQ:

-55.09%

Current Drawdown

RFIL:

-63.30%

ONEQ:

-4.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFIL achieves a 12.02% return, which is significantly higher than ONEQ's -0.59% return. Over the past 10 years, RFIL has underperformed ONEQ with an annualized return of 2.69%, while ONEQ has yielded a comparatively higher 15.31% annualized return.


RFIL

YTD

12.02%

1M

14.96%

6M

6.57%

1Y

38.35%

3Y*

-12.62%

5Y*

-4.63%

10Y*

2.69%

ONEQ

YTD

-0.59%

1M

10.01%

6M

0.72%

1Y

13.97%

3Y*

17.70%

5Y*

16.23%

10Y*

15.31%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RF Industries, Ltd.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RFIL vs. ONEQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFIL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RFIL is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RFIL is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RFIL is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RFIL is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RFIL is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RFIL is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

ONEQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ONEQ is 5353
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ONEQ is 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ONEQ is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ONEQ is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ONEQ is 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ONEQ is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RFIL vs. ONEQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RFIL Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is higher than the ONEQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFIL and ONEQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

RFIL vs. ONEQ - Dividend Comparison

RFIL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ONEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RFIL
RF Industries, Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.41%1.18%1.10%2.96%4.57%6.36%6.88%
ONEQ
Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock
0.63%0.65%0.71%0.97%0.54%0.71%1.64%1.08%0.84%1.12%1.04%1.19%

Drawdowns

RFIL vs. ONEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFIL drawdown since its inception was -90.15%, which is greater than ONEQ's maximum drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFIL and ONEQ.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

RFIL vs. ONEQ - Volatility Comparison

RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) has a higher volatility of 8.80% compared to Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ) at 5.94%. This indicates that RFIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ONEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...