RFI vs. CREMX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund (RFI) and Redwood Real Estate Income Fund (CREMX).

RFI is managed by Cohen & Steers. CREMX is an actively managed fund by Redwood. It was launched on Jun 23, 2023.

Performance

RFI vs. CREMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund (RFI) and Redwood Real Estate Income Fund (CREMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RFI vs. CREMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
RFI Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund	2.96%	3.55%	6.63%	10.54%
CREMX Redwood Real Estate Income Fund	1.84%	7.72%	8.09%	1.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFI achieves a 2.96% return, which is significantly higher than CREMX's 1.84% return.

RFI

• 1D: 2.30%
• 1M: -6.52%
• YTD: 2.96%
• 6M: -3.98%
• 1Y: 0.08%
• 3Y*: 5.53%
• 5Y*: 2.29%
• 10Y*: 6.50%

CREMX

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 1.84%
• 6M: 3.80%
• 1Y: 7.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFI vs. CREMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CREMX

Redwood Real Estate Income Fund

Return for Risk

RFI vs. CREMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFI

RFI Risk / Return Rank: 6
RFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
RFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
RFI Omega Ratio Rank: 5
RFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
RFI Martin Ratio Rank: 7

CREMX

CREMX Risk / Return Rank: 100
CREMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CREMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CREMX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CREMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CREMX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFI vs. CREMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund (RFI) and Redwood Real Estate Income Fund (CREMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RFI	CREMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.01	10.81	-10.80
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.12	14.46	-14.34
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	13.62	-12.60
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.09	16.19	-16.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.24	101.79	-101.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RFI vs. CREMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFI Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the CREMX Sharpe Ratio of 10.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFI and CREMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RFI	CREMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01	10.81	-10.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	8.81	-8.47

Correlation

The correlation between RFI and CREMX is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

RFI vs. CREMX - Dividend Comparison

RFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.62%, more than CREMX's 6.66% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RFI Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund	8.62%	8.69%	8.29%	8.17%	10.02%	6.82%	7.61%	6.63%	8.93%	7.52%	7.93%	10.36%
CREMX Redwood Real Estate Income Fund	6.66%	7.38%	7.64%	1.98%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

RFI vs. CREMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFI drawdown since its inception was -73.67%, which is greater than CREMX's maximum drawdown of -0.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFI and CREMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RFI	CREMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.67%	-0.71%	-72.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.28%	-0.04%	-11.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.93%	0.00%	-7.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.15%	-0.02%	-12.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.12%	0.08%	+4.04%

Volatility

RFI vs. CREMX - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund (RFI) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to Redwood Real Estate Income Fund (CREMX) at 0.11%. This indicates that RFI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CREMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RFI	CREMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.01%	0.11%	+4.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.90%	0.29%	+8.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.57%	0.67%	+14.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.43%	0.89%	+19.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.14%	0.89%	+24.25%