RFFC vs. WLTG
Compare and contrast key facts about ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) and WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG).
RFFC and WLTG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RFFC is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Jun 7, 2016. WLTG is an actively managed fund by WealthTrust. It was launched on Dec 6, 2021.
Performance
RFFC vs. WLTG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RFFC vs. WLTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFFC ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF | -0.91% | 16.83% | 23.51% | 19.50% | -14.58% | 1.98% |
WLTG WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF | -2.68% | 24.55% | 26.90% | 17.00% | -22.64% | 1.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFFC achieves a -0.91% return, which is significantly higher than WLTG's -2.68% return.
RFFC
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- -5.66%
- YTD
- -0.91%
- 6M
- 3.63%
- 1Y
- 20.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- —
WLTG
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -5.29%
- YTD
- -2.68%
- 6M
- 1.42%
- 1Y
- 25.35%
- 3Y*
- 20.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFFC vs. WLTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFFC has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than WLTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RFFC vs. WLTG — Risk / Return Rank
RFFC
WLTG
RFFC vs. WLTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) and WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFFC | WLTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 1.53 | -0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 2.18 | -0.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.31 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 2.68 | -0.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.93 | 11.01 | -3.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFFC | WLTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 1.53 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.54 | +0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between RFFC and WLTG is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RFFC vs. WLTG - Dividend Comparison
RFFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than WLTG's 4.55% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFFC ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF | 0.81% | 0.78% | 1.05% | 1.35% | 1.41% | 0.71% | 1.79% | 1.34% | 1.36% | 0.93% | 0.66% |
WLTG WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF | 4.55% | 4.43% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.44% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RFFC vs. WLTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFFC drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, which is greater than WLTG's maximum drawdown of -25.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFFC and WLTG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFFC | WLTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.26% | -25.14% | -11.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.73% | -9.56% | -2.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -6.91% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -9.40% | +4.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 2.33% | +0.27% |
Volatility
RFFC vs. WLTG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) is 5.35%, while WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF (WLTG) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that RFFC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WLTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RFFC | WLTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 5.68% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | 10.88% | -1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.08% | 16.70% | +0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 15.24% | +1.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 15.24% | +2.81% |