PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFFC vs. DTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFFC vs. DTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) and ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFFC achieves a 10.59% return, which is significantly higher than DTEC's 3.04% return.


RFFC

1D
-0.47%
1M
3.42%
YTD
10.59%
6M
10.88%
1Y
28.37%
3Y*
21.20%
5Y*
12.38%
10Y*

DTEC

1D
-2.82%
1M
7.50%
YTD
3.04%
6M
1.62%
1Y
5.25%
3Y*
9.62%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFFC vs. DTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RFFC
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF
10.59%16.83%23.51%19.50%-14.58%22.33%12.48%24.77%-10.23%
DTEC
ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF
3.04%7.21%9.89%25.03%-31.29%4.89%44.12%35.44%-4.96%

Correlation

The correlation between RFFC and DTEC is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018

0.84

The correlation between RFFC and DTEC shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RFFC vs. DTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RFFC
DTEC

Technology

29.8%
60.0%

Industrials

13.2%
13.7%

Healthcare

11.8%
10.4%

Financial Services

11.5%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
1.0%

Communication Services

9.2%
2.2%

Energy

4.4%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%

-

Utilities

2.6%
3.1%

Basic Materials

2.3%

-

Real Estate

2.2%
1.1%

Technology

RFFC
29.8%
DTEC
60.0%

Industrials

RFFC
13.2%
DTEC
13.7%

Healthcare

RFFC
11.8%
DTEC
10.4%

Financial Services

RFFC
11.5%
DTEC
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

RFFC
9.9%
DTEC
1.0%

Communication Services

RFFC
9.2%
DTEC
2.2%

Energy

RFFC
4.4%
DTEC
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

RFFC
3.1%
DTEC

-

Utilities

RFFC
2.6%
DTEC
3.1%

Basic Materials

RFFC
2.3%
DTEC

-

Real Estate

RFFC
2.2%
DTEC
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFFC vs. DTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFFC
RFFC Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
RFFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFFC Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
RFFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFFC Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

DTEC
DTEC Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
DTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
DTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFFC vs. DTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) and ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RFFCDTECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.06

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

0.26

+2.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.17

0.60

+13.57

RFFC vs. DTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFFC Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the DTEC Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFFC and DTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RFFCDTECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

0.29

+2.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.08

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.38

+0.33

Drawdowns

RFFC vs. DTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFFC drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, smaller than the maximum DTEC drawdown of -42.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFFC and DTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFFCDTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.26%

-42.00%

+5.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.25%

-20.31%

+11.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.45%

-21.47%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.29%

-42.00%

+19.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-5.09%

+4.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.02%

-13.31%

+8.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

8.71%

-6.70%

Volatility

RFFC vs. DTEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) is 3.00%, while ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC) has a volatility of 6.58%. This indicates that RFFC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFFCDTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

6.58%

-3.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.32%

14.30%

-4.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.00%

18.33%

-6.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.27%

22.07%

-5.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.97%

22.89%

-4.92%

RFFC vs. DTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFFC has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than DTEC's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFFC vs. DTEC - Dividend Comparison

RFFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, more than DTEC's 0.04% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DTEC
ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF
0.04%0.04%0.45%0.27%0.02%0.26%0.37%0.43%0.33%0.00%0.00%
RFFC
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF
0.72%0.78%1.05%1.35%1.41%0.71%1.79%1.34%1.36%0.93%0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


RFFC and DTEC have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DTEC has higher volatility (6.58%) compared to RFFC (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFFC dropped -36.26% vs DTEC's -42.00%.

On 5-year performance, RFFC leads with 12.38% vs 1.86% for DTEC. On fees, RFFC is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, RFFC has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RFFC has performed better with a 12.38% return vs 1.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RFFC is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DTEC.

RFFC has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.04% for DTEC.

RFFC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DTEC is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for RFFC and 0.50% for DTEC.

RFFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFFC and DTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer