RFFC vs. DTEC
RFFC (ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF) and DTEC (ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RFFC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by SS&C, while DTEC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Disruptive Technologies Index. RFFC is actively managed, while DTEC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RFFC returned 12.38%/yr vs 1.86%/yr for DTEC. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RFFC charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DTEC.
Performance
RFFC vs. DTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFFC achieves a 10.59% return, which is significantly higher than DTEC's 3.04% return.
RFFC
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- YTD
- 10.59%
- 6M
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- 28.37%
- 3Y*
- 21.20%
- 5Y*
- 12.38%
- 10Y*
- —
DTEC
- 1D
- -2.82%
- 1M
- 7.50%
- YTD
- 3.04%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- 5.25%
- 3Y*
- 9.62%
- 5Y*
- 1.86%
- 10Y*
- —
RFFC vs. DTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFFC ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF | 10.59% | 16.83% | 23.51% | 19.50% | -14.58% | 22.33% | 12.48% | 24.77% | -10.23% |
DTEC ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF | 3.04% | 7.21% | 9.89% | 25.03% | -31.29% | 4.89% | 44.12% | 35.44% | -4.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between RFFC and DTEC is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018 | 0.84 |
The correlation between RFFC and DTEC shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RFFC vs. DTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RFFC
DTEC
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
Technology
RFFC
DTEC
Industrials
RFFC
DTEC
Healthcare
RFFC
DTEC
Financial Services
RFFC
DTEC
Consumer Cyclical
RFFC
DTEC
Communication Services
RFFC
DTEC
Energy
RFFC
DTEC
Consumer Defensive
RFFC
DTEC
-
Utilities
RFFC
DTEC
Basic Materials
RFFC
DTEC
-
Real Estate
RFFC
DTEC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RFFC vs. DTEC — Risk / Return Rank
RFFC
DTEC
RFFC vs. DTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) and ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFFC | DTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.06 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 0.26 | +2.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.17 | 0.60 | +13.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFFC | DTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38 | 0.29 | +2.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.08 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.38 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
RFFC vs. DTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFFC drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, smaller than the maximum DTEC drawdown of -42.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFFC and DTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFFC | DTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.26% | -42.00% | +5.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.25% | -20.31% | +11.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.45% | -21.47% | +3.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.29% | -42.00% | +19.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -5.09% | +4.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.02% | -13.31% | +8.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 8.71% | -6.70% |
Volatility
RFFC vs. DTEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) is 3.00%, while ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC) has a volatility of 6.58%. This indicates that RFFC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RFFC | DTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 6.58% | -3.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.32% | 14.30% | -4.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.00% | 18.33% | -6.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.27% | 22.07% | -5.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 22.89% | -4.92% |
RFFC vs. DTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFFC has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than DTEC's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
RFFC vs. DTEC - Dividend Comparison
RFFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, more than DTEC's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTEC ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.45% | 0.27% | 0.02% | 0.26% | 0.37% | 0.43% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RFFC ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF | 0.72% | 0.78% | 1.05% | 1.35% | 1.41% | 0.71% | 1.79% | 1.34% | 1.36% | 0.93% | 0.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RFFC and DTEC have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DTEC has higher volatility (6.58%) compared to RFFC (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFFC dropped -36.26% vs DTEC's -42.00%.
On 5-year performance, RFFC leads with 12.38% vs 1.86% for DTEC. On fees, RFFC is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, RFFC has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RFFC has performed better with a 12.38% return vs 1.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RFFC is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DTEC.
RFFC has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.04% for DTEC.
RFFC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DTEC is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for RFFC and 0.50% for DTEC.
RFFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RFFC and DTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer