PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFEU vs. FLGR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFEU vs. FLGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU) and Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFEU achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly higher than FLGR's 0.44% return.


RFEU

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.50%
6M
4.04%
1Y
13.97%
3Y*
12.44%
5Y*
3.74%
10Y*
7.29%

FLGR

1D
-1.91%
1M
3.04%
YTD
0.44%
6M
4.14%
1Y
3.18%
3Y*
17.60%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFEU vs. FLGR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFEU
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF
1.50%30.78%-1.78%16.19%-24.17%22.83%6.25%23.21%-17.57%0.11%
FLGR
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF
0.44%36.67%10.63%24.22%-21.96%5.40%12.11%19.99%-21.50%-0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between RFEU and FLGR is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between RFEU and FLGR has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RFEU vs. FLGR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RFEU
FLGR

Financial Services

18.9%
21.7%

Industrials

15.4%
30.5%

Healthcare

13.3%
5.8%

Technology

12.5%
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

9.3%
1.4%

Energy

8.7%

-

Utilities

6.4%
5.0%

Communication Services

3.8%
6.3%

Basic Materials

1.2%
5.9%

Real Estate

-

1.3%

Financial Services

RFEU
18.9%
FLGR
21.7%

Industrials

RFEU
15.4%
FLGR
30.5%

Healthcare

RFEU
13.3%
FLGR
5.8%

Technology

RFEU
12.5%
FLGR
13.9%

Consumer Cyclical

RFEU
10.6%
FLGR
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

RFEU
9.3%
FLGR
1.4%

Energy

RFEU
8.7%
FLGR

-

Utilities

RFEU
6.4%
FLGR
5.0%

Communication Services

RFEU
3.8%
FLGR
6.3%

Basic Materials

RFEU
1.2%
FLGR
5.9%

Real Estate

RFEU

-

FLGR
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFEU vs. FLGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFEU
RFEU Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
RFEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFEU Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
RFEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFEU Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FLGR
FLGR Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FLGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGR Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGR Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFEU vs. FLGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU) and Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RFEUFLGRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.05

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

0.22

+2.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.93

0.63

+10.30

RFEU vs. FLGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the FLGR Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFEU and FLGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RFEUFLGRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

0.19

+1.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.32

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.28

+0.14

Drawdowns

RFEU vs. FLGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFEU drawdown since its inception was -39.74%, smaller than the maximum FLGR drawdown of -46.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFEU and FLGR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFEUFLGRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.74%

-46.21%

+6.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.15%

-14.44%

+9.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.48%

-15.53%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.92%

-43.54%

+7.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-4.26%

+4.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.62%

-12.37%

+2.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

5.03%

-3.68%

Volatility

RFEU vs. FLGR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF (RFEU) is 0.00%, while Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) has a volatility of 6.23%. This indicates that RFEU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFEUFLGRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

6.23%

-6.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.43%

14.03%

-9.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.73%

17.18%

-8.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.77%

20.26%

-3.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.86%

21.43%

-3.57%

RFEU vs. FLGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFEU has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than FLGR's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFEU vs. FLGR - Dividend Comparison

RFEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than FLGR's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLGR
Franklin FTSE Germany ETF
1.71%1.72%2.40%2.99%3.50%2.67%2.61%2.52%3.06%0.00%0.00%
RFEU
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Europe ETF
2.83%2.87%5.45%3.37%4.98%1.82%2.32%3.08%2.84%1.35%3.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


RFEU and FLGR have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLGR has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to RFEU (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFEU dropped -39.74% vs FLGR's -46.21%.

On 5-year performance, FLGR leads with 6.45% vs 3.74% for RFEU. On fees, FLGR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, RFEU has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLGR has performed better with a 6.45% return vs 3.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLGR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for RFEU.

RFEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 1.71% for FLGR.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.83% for RFEU and 0.09% for FLGR.

RFEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFEU and FLGR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer