RFDA vs. BND
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND).
RFDA and BND are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RFDA is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Jun 7, 2016. BND is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RFDA or BND.
Correlation
The correlation between RFDA and BND is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
RFDA vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
RFDA:
0.47
BND:
0.98
RFDA:
0.85
BND:
1.41
RFDA:
1.12
BND:
1.17
RFDA:
0.52
BND:
0.41
RFDA:
1.85
BND:
2.49
RFDA:
5.43%
BND:
2.07%
RFDA:
19.48%
BND:
5.31%
RFDA:
-34.61%
BND:
-18.84%
RFDA:
-6.40%
BND:
-7.67%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFDA achieves a -1.95% return, which is significantly lower than BND's 1.86% return.
RFDA
-1.95%
9.00%
-5.31%
9.12%
15.92%
N/A
BND
1.86%
0.74%
1.04%
5.17%
-0.94%
1.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFDA vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFDA has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RFDA vs. BND — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
RFDA
BND
RFDA vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
RFDA vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
RFDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than BND's 3.77% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF | 2.41% | 2.23% | 2.68% | 3.57% | 1.44% | 1.48% | 1.87% | 2.44% | 1.90% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.77% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 1.97% | 2.22% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% | 2.79% |
Drawdowns
RFDA vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFDA drawdown since its inception was -34.61%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFDA and BND. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
RFDA vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) has a higher volatility of 5.78% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.55%. This indicates that RFDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...