RFCI vs. XAGG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RFCI (RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF) and XAGG (Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RFCI charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for XAGG.

Performance

RFCI vs. XAGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) and Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF (XAGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFCI achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly lower than XAGG's 1.93% return.

RFCI

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 0.13%
• 6M: 0.05%
• 1Y: 4.60%
• 3Y*: 4.55%
• 5Y*: 1.22%
• 10Y*: —

XAGG

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 1.93%
• 6M: 2.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFCI vs. XAGG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RFCI RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF	0.13%	0.45%
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF	1.93%	1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between RFCI and XAGG is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025	0.62

Return for Risk

RFCI vs. XAGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFCI

RFCI Risk / Return Rank: 36
RFCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
RFCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
RFCI Omega Ratio Rank: 35
RFCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
RFCI Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFCI vs. XAGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) and Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF (XAGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RFCI	XAGG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.74	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.23	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RFCI	XAGG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	1.88	-1.46

Drawdowns

RFCI vs. XAGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFCI drawdown since its inception was -14.18%, which is greater than XAGG's maximum drawdown of -2.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFCI and XAGG.

Drawdown Indicators

	RFCI	XAGG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.18%	-2.88%	-11.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.10%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.38%	-0.49%	-0.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.23%	-0.57%	-2.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RFCI	XAGG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.29%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.70%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.53%	3.48%	+0.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.13%	3.48%	+1.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.95%	3.48%	+1.47%

RFCI vs. XAGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFCI has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than XAGG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

RFCI vs. XAGG - Dividend Comparison

RFCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than XAGG's 3.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
RFCI RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF	4.54%	4.55%	4.30%	3.55%	2.26%	3.45%	2.04%	2.66%	2.76%	2.03%	1.97%
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF	3.86%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RFCI and XAGG in my portfolio?

RFCI and XAGG have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RFCI or XAGG?

On fees, XAGG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RFCI or XAGG?

XAGG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for RFCI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RFCI or XAGG?

RFCI has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 3.86% for XAGG.

What is the main difference between RFCI and XAGG?

They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for RFCI and 0.50% for XAGG.