RFCI vs. PRAB
RFCI (RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF) and PRAB (State Street IG Public & Private ABS ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RFCI charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for PRAB.
Performance
RFCI vs. PRAB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RFCI
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- 6M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 1Y
- 2.00%
- 3Y*
- 4.49%
- 5Y*
- 0.80%
- 10Y*
- 1.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.96%
PRAB
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.12K | $7.87K | $93.05K | |
| $73.72K | $61.78K | $39.56K |
RFCI vs. PRAB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RFCI RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF | -0.66% |
PRAB State Street IG Public & Private ABS ETF | 1.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between RFCI and PRAB is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2026 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RFCI vs. PRAB — Risk / Return Rank
RFCI
PRAB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RFCI vs. PRAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) and State Street IG Public & Private ABS ETF (PRAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RFCI | PRAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.91 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RFCI vs. PRAB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFCI drawdown since its inception was -14.18%, which is greater than PRAB's maximum drawdown of -0.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFCI and PRAB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFCI | PRAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.18% | -0.48% | -13.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.68% | -0.04% | -1.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.20% | -0.08% | -3.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | — | — |
Volatility
RFCI vs. PRAB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RFCI | PRAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.84% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.57% | 1.08% | +2.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.15% | 1.08% | +4.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.93% | 1.08% | +3.85% |
RFCI vs. PRAB - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFCI has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than PRAB's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
RFCI vs. PRAB - Dividend Comparison
RFCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, more than PRAB's 1.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRAB State Street IG Public & Private ABS ETF | 1.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RFCI RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF | 4.58% | 4.55% | 4.30% | 3.55% | 2.26% | 3.45% | 2.04% | 2.66% | 2.76% | 2.03% | 1.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RFCI and PRAB have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRAB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRAB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for RFCI.
RFCI has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 1.91% for PRAB.
They also come from different issuers: SS&C and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for RFCI and 0.39% for PRAB.
Find the right allocation for RFCI and PRAB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer