RFCI vs. NFLT
RFCI (RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF) and NFLT (Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, RFCI returned 1.79%/yr vs 3.82%/yr for NFLT. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RFCI charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for NFLT.
Performance
RFCI vs. NFLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFCI achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly lower than NFLT's 1.65% return. Over the past 10 years, RFCI has underperformed NFLT with an annualized return of 1.79%, while NFLT has yielded a comparatively higher 3.82% annualized return.
RFCI
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- 6M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 1Y
- 2.00%
- 3Y*
- 4.49%
- 5Y*
- 0.80%
- 10Y*
- 1.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.96%
NFLT
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 5.10%
- 3Y*
- 7.12%
- 5Y*
- 2.97%
- 10Y*
- 3.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.03%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.33M | $1.91M | $2.12M | |
| $73.72K | $61.78K | $39.56K |
RFCI vs. NFLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFCI RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF | -0.18% | 6.85% | 2.64% | 5.97% | -9.27% | -1.48% | 6.48% | 8.69% | -1.30% | 3.14% |
NFLT Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF | 1.65% | 8.77% | 6.05% | 9.16% | -9.49% | 1.18% | 8.02% | 10.13% | -2.68% | 6.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between RFCI and NFLT is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2016 | 0.43 |
The correlation between RFCI and NFLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RFCI vs. NFLT — Risk / Return Rank
RFCI
NFLT
RFCI vs. NFLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) and Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RFCI | NFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.23 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 2.12 | -1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.91 | 8.64 | -6.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RFCI vs. NFLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFCI drawdown since its inception was -14.18%, smaller than the maximum NFLT drawdown of -15.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFCI and NFLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFCI | NFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.18% | -15.17% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.65% | -2.42% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.27% | -3.15% | -1.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.40% | -13.42% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.18% | -15.17% | +0.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.68% | -0.75% | -0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.20% | -2.08% | -1.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | 0.59% | +0.46% |
Volatility
RFCI vs. NFLT - Volatility Comparison
RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) has a higher volatility of 1.18% compared to Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT) at 0.97%. This indicates that RFCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RFCI | NFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.18% | 0.97% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.84% | 3.20% | -0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.57% | 4.06% | -0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.15% | 4.49% | +0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.93% | 4.92% | +0.01% |
RFCI vs. NFLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFCI has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than NFLT's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
RFCI vs. NFLT - Dividend Comparison
RFCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than NFLT's 5.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFLT Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF | 5.47% | 5.74% | 5.76% | 6.02% | 4.16% | 3.41% | 3.63% | 4.33% | 4.81% | 6.23% | 5.30% | 0.67% |
RFCI RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF | 4.58% | 4.55% | 4.30% | 3.55% | 2.26% | 3.45% | 2.04% | 2.66% | 2.76% | 2.03% | 1.97% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RFCI and NFLT have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RFCI has higher volatility (1.18%) compared to NFLT (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFCI dropped -14.18% vs NFLT's -15.17%.
On 10-year performance, NFLT leads with 3.82% vs 1.79% for RFCI. On fees, NFLT is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, NFLT has been the lower-risk option at 0.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, NFLT has performed better with a 3.82% return vs 1.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NFLT is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for RFCI.
NFLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.47%, compared with 4.58% for RFCI.
They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for RFCI and 0.50% for NFLT.
NFLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RFCI and NFLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer