RFCI vs. DBO
RFCI (RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - RFCI is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by SS&C, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. RFCI is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RFCI returned 2.08%/yr vs 9.22%/yr for DBO. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. RFCI charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
RFCI vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFCI achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 50.16% return. Over the past 10 years, RFCI has underperformed DBO with an annualized return of 2.08%, while DBO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.22% annualized return.
RFCI
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 0.55%
- 1Y
- 3.92%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- 1.21%
- 10Y*
- 2.08%
DBO
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -18.58%
- YTD
- 50.16%
- 6M
- 47.74%
- 1Y
- 36.30%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.16%
- 10Y*
- 9.22%
RFCI vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFCI RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF | 0.35% | 6.85% | 2.64% | 5.97% | -9.27% | -1.48% | 6.48% | 8.69% | -1.30% | 3.14% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 50.16% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | 60.74% | -20.99% | 28.05% | -15.22% | 4.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between RFCI and DBO is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2016 | -0.12 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between RFCI and DBO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.12 to -0.39, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RFCI vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
RFCI
DBO
RFCI vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RFCI | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.19 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 1.58 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.24 | 4.29 | -0.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RFCI vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFCI drawdown since its inception was -14.18%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFCI and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFCI | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.18% | -90.18% | +76.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.65% | -23.03% | +20.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.10% | -28.20% | +23.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.46% | -37.68% | +24.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.18% | -61.69% | +47.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -60.48% | +59.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.22% | -62.22% | +59.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 8.51% | -7.58% |
Volatility
RFCI vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) is 1.00%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 10.29%. This indicates that RFCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RFCI | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.00% | 10.29% | -9.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.69% | 29.36% | -26.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.52% | 34.89% | -31.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.13% | 32.54% | -27.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.94% | 31.81% | -26.87% |
RFCI vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFCI has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
RFCI vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
RFCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, more than DBO's 2.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 2.34% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RFCI RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF | 4.55% | 4.55% | 4.30% | 3.55% | 2.26% | 3.45% | 2.04% | 2.66% | 2.76% | 2.03% | 1.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RFCI and DBO have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to RFCI (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFCI dropped -14.18% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 10-year performance, DBO leads with 9.22% vs 2.08% for RFCI. On fees, RFCI is cheaper at 0.54% per year. On volatility, RFCI has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBO has performed better with a 9.22% return vs 2.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RFCI is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
RFCI has the higher dividend yield at 4.55%, compared with 2.34% for DBO.
RFCI is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for RFCI and 0.78% for DBO.
RFCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RFCI and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer