RFCI vs. ACES
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) and ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES).
RFCI and ACES are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RFCI is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Jun 14, 2016. ACES is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the CIBC Atlas Clean Energy Index. It was launched on Jun 29, 2018.
Performance
RFCI vs. ACES - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RFCI vs. ACES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFCI RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF | -0.21% | 6.85% | 2.64% | 5.97% | -9.27% | -1.48% | 6.48% | 8.69% | 0.70% |
ACES ALPS Clean Energy ETF | 3.39% | 25.44% | -26.71% | -20.04% | -28.44% | -19.44% | 140.33% | 51.70% | -9.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFCI achieves a -0.21% return, which is significantly lower than ACES's 3.39% return.
RFCI
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- -0.21%
- 6M
- 0.66%
- 1Y
- 4.13%
- 3Y*
- 4.22%
- 5Y*
- 1.34%
- 10Y*
- —
ACES
- 1D
- 4.26%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 3.39%
- 6M
- 5.24%
- 1Y
- 47.29%
- 3Y*
- -9.44%
- 5Y*
- -14.81%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFCI vs. ACES - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFCI has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than ACES's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RFCI vs. ACES — Risk / Return Rank
RFCI
ACES
RFCI vs. ACES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) and ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFCI | ACES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 1.36 | -0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.42 | 1.93 | -0.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.23 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 2.66 | -1.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.23 | 6.60 | -1.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFCI | ACES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 1.36 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | -0.41 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.14 | +0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between RFCI and ACES is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RFCI vs. ACES - Dividend Comparison
RFCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than ACES's 0.68% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFCI RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF | 4.51% | 4.55% | 4.30% | 3.55% | 2.26% | 3.45% | 2.04% | 2.66% | 2.76% | 2.03% | 1.97% |
ACES ALPS Clean Energy ETF | 0.68% | 0.70% | 1.10% | 1.44% | 1.08% | 0.71% | 0.56% | 1.79% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RFCI vs. ACES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFCI drawdown since its inception was -14.18%, smaller than the maximum ACES drawdown of -79.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFCI and ACES.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFCI | ACES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.18% | -79.05% | +64.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.61% | -17.44% | +14.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.46% | -74.44% | +60.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.71% | -64.99% | +63.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.26% | -38.35% | +35.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.81% | 7.03% | -6.22% |
Volatility
RFCI vs. ACES - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) is 1.54%, while ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) has a volatility of 10.50%. This indicates that RFCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RFCI | ACES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.54% | 10.50% | -8.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.50% | 25.76% | -23.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.04% | 35.00% | -30.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.10% | 36.22% | -31.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.96% | 35.71% | -30.75% |