RFBSX vs. DFAIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Russell Investments Short Duration Bond Fund (RFBSX) and DFA Short-Duration Real Return Portfolio (DFAIX).
RFBSX is managed by Russell. It was launched on Oct 30, 1981. DFAIX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Nov 5, 2013.
Performance
RFBSX vs. DFAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RFBSX vs. DFAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFBSX Russell Investments Short Duration Bond Fund | 0.06% | 5.92% | 4.67% | 5.06% | -4.95% | -0.75% | 4.98% | 4.69% | 1.27% | 1.33% |
DFAIX DFA Short-Duration Real Return Portfolio | 0.86% | 4.86% | 6.38% | 5.64% | -2.77% | 5.40% | 2.75% | 5.63% | 0.11% | 1.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFBSX achieves a 0.06% return, which is significantly lower than DFAIX's 0.86% return. Over the past 10 years, RFBSX has underperformed DFAIX with an annualized return of 2.31%, while DFAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.20% annualized return.
RFBSX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- 0.06%
- 6M
- 1.15%
- 1Y
- 4.09%
- 3Y*
- 4.68%
- 5Y*
- 1.99%
- 10Y*
- 2.31%
DFAIX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 0.86%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 3.68%
- 3Y*
- 5.27%
- 5Y*
- 3.82%
- 10Y*
- 3.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFBSX vs. DFAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFBSX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAIX's 0.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RFBSX vs. DFAIX — Risk / Return Rank
RFBSX
DFAIX
RFBSX vs. DFAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Short Duration Bond Fund (RFBSX) and DFA Short-Duration Real Return Portfolio (DFAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFBSX | DFAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.70 | 3.57 | -0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.05 | 5.96 | -1.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 2.07 | -0.49 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.14 | 8.64 | -4.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.47 | 34.01 | -16.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFBSX | DFAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70 | 3.57 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 1.21 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.33 | 1.26 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.02 | 1.08 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between RFBSX and DFAIX is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RFBSX vs. DFAIX - Dividend Comparison
RFBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, which matches DFAIX's 4.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFBSX Russell Investments Short Duration Bond Fund | 4.63% | 4.85% | 3.91% | 2.83% | 0.68% | 1.72% | 2.23% | 2.43% | 2.32% | 1.33% | 1.73% | 1.48% |
DFAIX DFA Short-Duration Real Return Portfolio | 4.61% | 4.65% | 4.14% | 3.66% | 1.68% | 0.98% | 0.82% | 2.53% | 2.72% | 1.71% | 1.41% | 1.29% |
Drawdowns
RFBSX vs. DFAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFBSX drawdown since its inception was -9.71%, which is greater than DFAIX's maximum drawdown of -5.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFBSX and DFAIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFBSX | DFAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.71% | -5.63% | -4.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.04% | -0.47% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.80% | -5.46% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -7.80% | -5.63% | -2.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.78% | -0.28% | -0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.22% | -0.95% | -1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.25% | 0.12% | +0.13% |
Volatility
RFBSX vs. DFAIX - Volatility Comparison
Russell Investments Short Duration Bond Fund (RFBSX) has a higher volatility of 0.57% compared to DFA Short-Duration Real Return Portfolio (DFAIX) at 0.50%. This indicates that RFBSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RFBSX | DFAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.57% | 0.50% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.91% | 0.75% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52% | 1.07% | +0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.04% | 3.18% | -1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.74% | 2.56% | -0.82% |