PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REVS vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REVS vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REVS achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 12.30% return.


REVS

1D
-0.01%
1M
3.64%
YTD
11.50%
6M
12.18%
1Y
26.29%
3Y*
18.50%
5Y*
11.10%
10Y*

VTV

1D
0.01%
1M
4.23%
YTD
12.30%
6M
13.12%
1Y
26.25%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
12.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REVS vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
REVS
Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF
11.50%16.80%16.36%13.46%-6.20%28.52%1.37%7.22%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
12.30%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%8.17%

Correlation

The correlation between REVS and VTV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019

0.92

The correlation between REVS and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

REVS vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
REVS
VTV

Financial Services

20.7%
22.3%

Technology

12.3%
13.4%

Healthcare

12.2%
14.5%

Industrials

12.1%
14.0%

Communication Services

8.4%
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
9.4%

Energy

6.5%
8.1%

Utilities

4.4%
5.2%

Real Estate

4.3%
2.8%

Basic Materials

4.0%
3.1%

Financial Services

REVS
20.7%
VTV
22.3%

Technology

REVS
12.3%
VTV
13.4%

Healthcare

REVS
12.2%
VTV
14.5%

Industrials

REVS
12.1%
VTV
14.0%

Communication Services

REVS
8.4%
VTV
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

REVS
7.6%
VTV
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

REVS
7.5%
VTV
9.4%

Energy

REVS
6.5%
VTV
8.1%

Utilities

REVS
4.4%
VTV
5.2%

Real Estate

REVS
4.3%
VTV
2.8%

Basic Materials

REVS
4.0%
VTV
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REVS vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REVS
REVS Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
REVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
REVS Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
REVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
REVS Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REVS vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REVSVTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.47

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.81

4.15

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.90

15.69

-1.79

REVS vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REVS Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REVS and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REVSVTVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.61

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.81

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.51

+0.17

Drawdowns

REVS vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REVS drawdown since its inception was -37.85%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REVS and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REVSVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.85%

-59.27%

+21.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.94%

-6.35%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.37%

-14.52%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.04%

-17.04%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

0.00%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-7.87%

+3.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

1.68%

+0.22%

Volatility

REVS vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) has a higher volatility of 2.66% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.52%. This indicates that REVS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REVSVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

2.52%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.46%

7.55%

+0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.50%

10.11%

+1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.91%

13.88%

+1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.13%

16.67%

+2.46%

REVS vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

REVS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

REVS vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

REVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than VTV's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REVS
Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF
1.91%2.13%1.89%2.49%2.46%1.18%27.75%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.86%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, REVS and VTV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

REVS has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to VTV (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REVS dropped -37.85% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 5-year performance, VTV leads with 11.24% vs 11.10% for REVS. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VTV has performed better with a 11.24% return vs 11.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for REVS.

REVS has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 1.86% for VTV.

REVS tracks Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Value Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for REVS and 0.04% for VTV.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REVS and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer