REVS vs. VTV
REVS (Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - REVS tracks the Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Value Index while VTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, REVS returned 11.10%/yr vs 11.24%/yr for VTV. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. REVS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.
Performance
REVS vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REVS achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 12.30% return.
REVS
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 11.50%
- 6M
- 12.18%
- 1Y
- 26.29%
- 3Y*
- 18.50%
- 5Y*
- 11.10%
- 10Y*
- —
VTV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 12.30%
- 6M
- 13.12%
- 1Y
- 26.25%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 11.24%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
REVS vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REVS Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF | 11.50% | 16.80% | 16.36% | 13.46% | -6.20% | 28.52% | 1.37% | 7.22% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 12.30% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 8.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between REVS and VTV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019 | 0.92 |
The correlation between REVS and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
REVS vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
REVS
VTV
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
REVS
VTV
Technology
REVS
VTV
Healthcare
REVS
VTV
Industrials
REVS
VTV
Communication Services
REVS
VTV
Consumer Cyclical
REVS
VTV
Consumer Defensive
REVS
VTV
Energy
REVS
VTV
Utilities
REVS
VTV
Real Estate
REVS
VTV
Basic Materials
REVS
VTV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REVS vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
REVS
VTV
REVS vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REVS | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.47 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | 4.15 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.90 | 15.69 | -1.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REVS | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 2.61 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.81 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.51 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
REVS vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REVS drawdown since its inception was -37.85%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REVS and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REVS | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.85% | -59.27% | +21.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.94% | -6.35% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.37% | -14.52% | -1.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.04% | -17.04% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | 0.00% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.66% | -7.87% | +3.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 1.68% | +0.22% |
Volatility
REVS vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) has a higher volatility of 2.66% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.52%. This indicates that REVS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REVS | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.66% | 2.52% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.46% | 7.55% | +0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.50% | 10.11% | +1.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.91% | 13.88% | +1.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 16.67% | +2.46% |
REVS vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
REVS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
REVS vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
REVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than VTV's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REVS Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF | 1.91% | 2.13% | 1.89% | 2.49% | 2.46% | 1.18% | 27.75% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.86% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, REVS and VTV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
REVS has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to VTV (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REVS dropped -37.85% vs VTV's -59.27%.
On 5-year performance, VTV leads with 11.24% vs 11.10% for REVS. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VTV has performed better with a 11.24% return vs 11.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for REVS.
REVS has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 1.86% for VTV.
REVS tracks Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Value Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for REVS and 0.04% for VTV.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REVS and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer