REVS vs. VMAX
REVS (Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF) and VMAX (Hartford US Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. REVS is passively managed, while VMAX is actively managed. Over the past year, REVS returned 25.40% vs 29.83% for VMAX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. REVS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for VMAX.
Performance
REVS vs. VMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REVS achieves a 12.34% return, which is significantly lower than VMAX's 15.89% return.
REVS
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 12.34%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 25.40%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.72%
- 10Y*
- —
VMAX
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- YTD
- 15.89%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 29.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REVS vs. VMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
REVS Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF | 12.34% | 16.80% | 16.36% | 5.22% |
VMAX Hartford US Value ETF | 15.89% | 15.65% | 15.89% | 5.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between REVS and VMAX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023 | 0.92 |
The correlation between REVS and VMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
REVS vs. VMAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
REVS
VMAX
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
REVS
VMAX
Technology
REVS
VMAX
Industrials
REVS
VMAX
Healthcare
REVS
VMAX
Communication Services
REVS
VMAX
Consumer Cyclical
REVS
VMAX
Consumer Defensive
REVS
VMAX
Energy
REVS
VMAX
Utilities
REVS
VMAX
Real Estate
REVS
VMAX
Basic Materials
REVS
VMAX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REVS vs. VMAX — Risk / Return Rank
REVS
VMAX
REVS vs. VMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) and Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REVS | VMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.43 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | 6.08 | -2.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.35 | 21.32 | -7.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REVS vs. VMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REVS drawdown since its inception was -37.85%, which is greater than VMAX's maximum drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REVS and VMAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REVS | VMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.85% | -19.05% | -18.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.94% | -4.93% | -2.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | 0.00% | -0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.62% | -2.52% | -2.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 1.40% | +0.51% |
Volatility
REVS vs. VMAX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) and Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX) have volatilities of 3.09% and 3.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REVS | VMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.09% | 3.22% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.45% | 8.83% | -0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.52% | 12.29% | -0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.90% | 15.39% | -0.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.07% | 15.39% | +3.68% |
REVS vs. VMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
REVS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than VMAX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
REVS vs. VMAX - Dividend Comparison
REVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than VMAX's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REVS Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF | 1.90% | 2.13% | 1.89% | 2.49% | 2.46% | 1.18% | 27.75% | 0.70% |
VMAX Hartford US Value ETF | 1.86% | 2.14% | 1.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, REVS and VMAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VMAX has higher volatility (3.22%) compared to REVS (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REVS dropped -37.85% vs VMAX's -19.05%.
On 1-year performance, VMAX leads with 29.83% vs 25.40% for REVS. On fees, REVS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, REVS has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VMAX has performed better with a 29.83% return vs 25.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
REVS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for VMAX.
REVS has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 1.86% for VMAX.
They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for REVS and 0.29% for VMAX.
VMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REVS and VMAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer