PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REVS vs. LVDS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REVS vs. LVDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REVS achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly lower than LVDS's 13.56% return.


REVS

1D
-0.01%
1M
3.64%
YTD
11.50%
6M
12.18%
1Y
26.29%
3Y*
18.50%
5Y*
11.10%
10Y*

LVDS

1D
0.18%
1M
3.85%
YTD
13.56%
6M
14.52%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REVS vs. LVDS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between REVS and LVDS is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025

0.92

REVS vs. LVDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
REVS
LVDS

Financial Services

20.7%
18.3%

Technology

12.3%
15.9%

Healthcare

12.2%
8.6%

Industrials

12.1%
10.2%

Communication Services

8.4%
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
6.5%

Energy

6.5%
6.6%

Utilities

4.4%
4.8%

Real Estate

4.3%
4.2%

Basic Materials

4.0%
1.7%

Financial Services

REVS
20.7%
LVDS
18.3%

Technology

REVS
12.3%
LVDS
15.9%

Healthcare

REVS
12.2%
LVDS
8.6%

Industrials

REVS
12.1%
LVDS
10.2%

Communication Services

REVS
8.4%
LVDS
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

REVS
7.6%
LVDS
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

REVS
7.5%
LVDS
6.5%

Energy

REVS
6.5%
LVDS
6.6%

Utilities

REVS
4.4%
LVDS
4.8%

Real Estate

REVS
4.3%
LVDS
4.2%

Basic Materials

REVS
4.0%
LVDS
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REVS vs. LVDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REVS
REVS Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
REVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
REVS Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
REVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
REVS Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

LVDS
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REVS vs. LVDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REVSLVDSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.90

REVS vs. LVDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REVSLVDSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

2.39

-1.71

Drawdowns

REVS vs. LVDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REVS drawdown since its inception was -37.85%, which is greater than LVDS's maximum drawdown of -6.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REVS and LVDS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REVSLVDSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.85%

-6.64%

-31.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

0.00%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-0.98%

-3.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

Volatility

REVS vs. LVDS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REVSLVDSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.50%

10.43%

+1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.91%

10.43%

+4.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.13%

10.43%

+8.70%

REVS vs. LVDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

REVS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than LVDS's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

REVS vs. LVDS - Dividend Comparison

REVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than LVDS's 7.56% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
LVDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF
7.56%8.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
REVS
Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF
1.91%2.13%1.89%2.49%2.46%1.18%27.75%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, REVS and LVDS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, REVS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

REVS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LVDS.

LVDS has the higher dividend yield at 7.56%, compared with 1.91% for REVS.

They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for REVS and 0.30% for LVDS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REVS and LVDS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer