REVS vs. LVDS
REVS (Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF) and LVDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. REVS is passively managed, while LVDS is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. REVS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LVDS.
Performance
REVS vs. LVDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REVS achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly lower than LVDS's 13.56% return.
REVS
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 11.50%
- 6M
- 12.18%
- 1Y
- 26.29%
- 3Y*
- 18.50%
- 5Y*
- 11.10%
- 10Y*
- —
LVDS
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 13.56%
- 6M
- 14.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REVS vs. LVDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
REVS Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF | 11.50% | 8.55% |
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF | 13.56% | 7.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between REVS and LVDS is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.92 |
REVS vs. LVDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
REVS
LVDS
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
REVS
LVDS
Technology
REVS
LVDS
Healthcare
REVS
LVDS
Industrials
REVS
LVDS
Communication Services
REVS
LVDS
Consumer Cyclical
REVS
LVDS
Consumer Defensive
REVS
LVDS
Energy
REVS
LVDS
Utilities
REVS
LVDS
Real Estate
REVS
LVDS
Basic Materials
REVS
LVDS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REVS vs. LVDS — Risk / Return Rank
REVS
LVDS
REVS vs. LVDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REVS | LVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.90 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REVS | LVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 2.39 | -1.71 |
Drawdowns
REVS vs. LVDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REVS drawdown since its inception was -37.85%, which is greater than LVDS's maximum drawdown of -6.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REVS and LVDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REVS | LVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.85% | -6.64% | -31.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | 0.00% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.66% | -0.98% | -3.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | — | — |
Volatility
REVS vs. LVDS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REVS | LVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.66% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.50% | 10.43% | +1.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.91% | 10.43% | +4.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 10.43% | +8.70% |
REVS vs. LVDS - Expense Ratio Comparison
REVS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than LVDS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
REVS vs. LVDS - Dividend Comparison
REVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than LVDS's 7.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF | 7.56% | 8.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REVS Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF | 1.91% | 2.13% | 1.89% | 2.49% | 2.46% | 1.18% | 27.75% | 0.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, REVS and LVDS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, REVS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
REVS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LVDS.
LVDS has the higher dividend yield at 7.56%, compared with 1.91% for REVS.
They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for REVS and 0.30% for LVDS.
Find the right allocation for REVS and LVDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer