PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RETSX vs. FEQHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RETSX vs. FEQHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Large Cap Fund (RETSX) and Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund (FEQHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RETSX having a 9.76% return and FEQHX slightly higher at 10.01%.


RETSX

1D
-0.07%
1M
5.72%
YTD
9.76%
6M
9.96%
1Y
24.28%
3Y*
19.33%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*
13.31%

FEQHX

1D
0.00%
1M
5.34%
YTD
10.01%
6M
9.45%
1Y
22.29%
3Y*
17.81%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RETSX vs. FEQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
RETSX
Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Large Cap Fund
9.76%14.45%20.43%24.74%-3.03%
FEQHX
Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund
10.01%13.61%19.46%17.65%-4.85%

Correlation

The correlation between RETSX and FEQHX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2022

0.97

The correlation between RETSX and FEQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RETSX vs. FEQHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RETSX
RETSX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
RETSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RETSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
RETSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
RETSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
RETSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FEQHX
FEQHX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FEQHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEQHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEQHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FEQHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEQHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RETSX vs. FEQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Large Cap Fund (RETSX) and Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund (FEQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RETSXFEQHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.45

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

3.11

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.86

12.42

-0.55

RETSX vs. FEQHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RETSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the FEQHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RETSX and FEQHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RETSXFEQHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

2.52

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

1.32

-0.87

Drawdowns

RETSX vs. FEQHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RETSX drawdown since its inception was -57.35%, which is greater than FEQHX's maximum drawdown of -10.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RETSX and FEQHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RETSXFEQHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.35%

-10.42%

-46.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.29%

-7.40%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.79%

-10.42%

-8.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

0.00%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.54%

-2.22%

-8.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

1.85%

+0.27%

Volatility

RETSX vs. FEQHX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Large Cap Fund (RETSX) has a higher volatility of 2.82% compared to Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund (FEQHX) at 2.68%. This indicates that RETSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEQHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RETSXFEQHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

2.68%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.75%

6.63%

+2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.71%

9.15%

+2.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.70%

11.24%

+5.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.82%

11.24%

+6.58%

RETSX vs. FEQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RETSX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than FEQHX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

RETSX vs. FEQHX - Dividend Comparison

RETSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than FEQHX's 0.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEQHX
Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund
0.51%0.43%0.61%0.77%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RETSX
Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Large Cap Fund
0.40%0.44%0.49%0.54%0.59%0.14%0.47%0.78%0.90%1.02%0.84%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, RETSX and FEQHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RETSX has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to FEQHX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RETSX dropped -57.35% vs FEQHX's -10.42%.

FEQHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RETSX and FEQHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer