RESM vs. HSMV
RESM (Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF) and HSMV (First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. RESM is passively managed, while HSMV is actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RESM charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for HSMV.
Performance
RESM vs. HSMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RESM achieves a 21.67% return, which is significantly higher than HSMV's 9.00% return.
RESM
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 5.32%
- 6M
- 21.06%
- YTD
- 21.67%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HSMV
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 5.71%
- 6M
- 8.75%
- YTD
- 9.00%
- 1Y
- 8.16%
- 3Y*
- 9.30%
- 5Y*
- 4.99%
- 10Y*
- —
RESM vs. HSMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RESM Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF | 21.67% | -3.32% |
HSMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF | 9.00% | 0.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between RESM and HSMV is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RESM vs. HSMV — Risk / Return Rank
RESM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HSMV
RESM vs. HSMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF (RESM) and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RESM | HSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.14 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.09 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.22 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RESM vs. HSMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RESM drawdown since its inception was -8.50%, smaller than the maximum HSMV drawdown of -19.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RESM and HSMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RESM | HSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.50% | -19.16% | +10.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | 0.00% | -0.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.77% | -5.56% | +3.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.63% | — |
Volatility
RESM vs. HSMV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RESM | HSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.44% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.79% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.36% | 10.52% | +6.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 15.00% | +2.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 16.01% | +1.35% |
RESM vs. HSMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RESM has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than HSMV's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
RESM vs. HSMV - Dividend Comparison
RESM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than HSMV's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF | 1.89% | 2.01% | 1.43% | 1.43% | 1.26% | 0.76% | 0.80% |
RESM Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RESM and HSMV have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RESM is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RESM is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for HSMV.
HSMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 0.08% for RESM.
They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for RESM and 0.80% for HSMV.
Find the right allocation for RESM and HSMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer