PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RERGX vs. WFSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RERGX vs. WFSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds EUPAC Fund Class R-6 (RERGX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RERGX achieves a 9.59% return, which is significantly higher than WFSPX's 8.57% return. Over the past 10 years, RERGX has underperformed WFSPX with an annualized return of 9.31%, while WFSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.32% annualized return.


RERGX

1D
3.38%
1M
0.82%
YTD
9.59%
6M
11.78%
1Y
25.32%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
4.58%
10Y*
9.31%

WFSPX

1D
1.75%
1M
-1.31%
YTD
8.57%
6M
8.91%
1Y
25.13%
3Y*
21.02%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*
15.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RERGX vs. WFSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RERGX
American Funds EUPAC Fund Class R-6
9.59%29.34%3.00%16.11%-22.77%2.84%25.27%27.40%-17.33%31.19%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund
8.57%17.83%24.94%26.25%-18.14%28.63%18.43%31.45%-4.83%21.27%

Correlation

The correlation between RERGX and WFSPX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010

0.78

The correlation between RERGX and WFSPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RERGX vs. WFSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RERGX
RERGX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
RERGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RERGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
RERGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
RERGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
RERGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

WFSPX
WFSPX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
WFSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
WFSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RERGX vs. WFSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds EUPAC Fund Class R-6 (RERGX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RERGXWFSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.36

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

2.73

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.13

12.42

-5.29

RERGX vs. WFSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RERGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the WFSPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RERGX and WFSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RERGX vs. WFSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RERGX drawdown since its inception was -37.30%, smaller than the maximum WFSPX drawdown of -58.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RERGX and WFSPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RERGXWFSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.30%

-58.21%

+20.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.52%

-8.90%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.62%

-18.74%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.30%

-24.51%

-12.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.30%

-33.74%

-3.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.44%

-2.79%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-12.76%

+3.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

1.95%

+1.42%

Volatility

RERGX vs. WFSPX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds EUPAC Fund Class R-6 (RERGX) has a higher volatility of 7.18% compared to iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX) at 4.43%. This indicates that RERGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WFSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RERGXWFSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.18%

4.43%

+2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.16%

9.70%

+4.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.42%

12.36%

+4.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.86%

16.95%

-0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.01%

18.05%

-1.04%

RERGX vs. WFSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RERGX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than WFSPX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

RERGX vs. WFSPX - Dividend Comparison

RERGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.22%, more than WFSPX's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RERGX
American Funds EUPAC Fund Class R-6
10.22%13.95%4.96%3.95%2.02%10.19%0.41%3.14%3.17%4.99%1.64%3.43%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund
1.61%1.72%1.41%1.50%2.02%1.82%1.66%1.99%2.00%1.62%2.37%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


RERGX and WFSPX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RERGX has higher volatility (7.18%) compared to WFSPX (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RERGX dropped -37.30% vs WFSPX's -58.21%.

WFSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RERGX and WFSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer