PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RERGX vs. AMHIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RERGX vs. AMHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6 (RERGX) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund (AMHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RERGX achieves a 11.44% return, which is significantly higher than AMHIX's 2.16% return. Over the past 10 years, RERGX has outperformed AMHIX with an annualized return of 9.12%, while AMHIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.29% annualized return.


RERGX

1D
-0.79%
1M
5.62%
YTD
11.44%
6M
13.85%
1Y
27.52%
3Y*
16.05%
5Y*
5.07%
10Y*
9.12%

AMHIX

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.84%
YTD
2.16%
6M
2.64%
1Y
8.02%
3Y*
6.11%
5Y*
1.71%
10Y*
3.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RERGX vs. AMHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RERGX
American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6
11.44%29.34%3.00%16.11%-22.77%2.84%25.27%27.40%-17.33%31.19%
AMHIX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund
2.16%5.70%6.19%7.18%-12.59%5.28%4.39%8.88%1.59%8.89%

Correlation

The correlation between RERGX and AMHIX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

-0.05

The correlation between RERGX and AMHIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RERGX vs. AMHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RERGX
RERGX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
RERGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RERGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
RERGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
RERGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
RERGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

AMHIX
AMHIX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
AMHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AMHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RERGX vs. AMHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6 (RERGX) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund (AMHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RERGXAMHIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.67

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

3.02

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.58

10.73

-2.15

RERGX vs. AMHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RERGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is lower than the AMHIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RERGX and AMHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RERGXAMHIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

2.77

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.35

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.73

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

1.40

-0.98

Drawdowns

RERGX vs. AMHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RERGX drawdown since its inception was -37.30%, which is greater than AMHIX's maximum drawdown of -21.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RERGX and AMHIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RERGXAMHIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.30%

-21.74%

-15.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.52%

-2.76%

-9.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.62%

-6.25%

-9.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.30%

-17.81%

-19.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.30%

-17.81%

-19.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-0.08%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.21%

-2.12%

-7.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

0.78%

+2.53%

Volatility

RERGX vs. AMHIX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6 (RERGX) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund (AMHIX) at 1.09%. This indicates that RERGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RERGXAMHIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.52%

1.09%

+4.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.93%

2.18%

+10.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.39%

3.02%

+12.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.67%

4.84%

+11.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.93%

4.53%

+12.40%

RERGX vs. AMHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RERGX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than AMHIX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

RERGX vs. AMHIX - Dividend Comparison

RERGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.52%, more than AMHIX's 3.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMHIX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund
3.89%5.26%3.80%3.10%2.53%3.23%3.40%3.46%3.67%4.01%3.55%4.03%
RERGX
American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6
12.52%13.95%4.96%3.95%2.02%10.19%0.41%3.14%3.17%4.99%1.64%3.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


RERGX and AMHIX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RERGX has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to AMHIX (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RERGX dropped -37.30% vs AMHIX's -21.74%.

AMHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RERGX and AMHIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer