REPYY vs. AAAU

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

REPYY (Repsol SA) is a stock, while AAAU (Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF) is Precious Metals fund tracking the LBMA Gold PM Price. Over the past 5 years, REPYY returned 20.83%/yr vs 18.89%/yr for AAAU. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

REPYY vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Repsol SA (REPYY) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REPYY achieves a 47.00% return, which is significantly higher than AAAU's 4.00% return.

REPYY

• 1D: 1.14%
• 1M: -1.52%
• YTD: 47.00%
• 6M: 45.44%
• 1Y: 107.14%
• 3Y*: 31.22%
• 5Y*: 20.83%
• 10Y*: 13.93%

AAAU

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -2.66%
• YTD: 4.00%
• 6M: 6.50%
• 1Y: 32.47%
• 3Y*: 31.82%
• 5Y*: 18.89%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REPYY vs. AAAU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
REPYY Repsol SA	47.00%	66.69%	-13.03%	-2.01%	41.58%	20.97%	-30.67%	6.40%	-12.60%
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF	4.00%	64.06%	26.91%	12.96%	-0.50%	-4.01%	25.02%	18.17%	9.20%

Correlation

The correlation between REPYY and AAAU is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2018	0.10

The correlation between REPYY and AAAU shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.17 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

REPYY vs. AAAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REPYY

REPYY Risk / Return Rank: 95
REPYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
REPYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
REPYY Omega Ratio Rank: 94
REPYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
REPYY Martin Ratio Rank: 95

AAAU

AAAU Risk / Return Rank: 34
AAAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
AAAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
AAAU Omega Ratio Rank: 37
AAAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
AAAU Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REPYY vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Repsol SA (REPYY) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	REPYY	AAAU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.69	1.24	+2.45
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.94	1.64	+2.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.25	+0.31
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.49	1.88	+4.61
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	21.62	4.73	+16.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

REPYY vs. AAAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REPYY Sharpe Ratio is 3.69, which is higher than the AAAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REPYY and AAAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	REPYY	AAAU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.69	1.24	+2.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	1.07	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	1.10	-0.64

Drawdowns

REPYY vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REPYY drawdown since its inception was -65.56%, which is greater than AAAU's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REPYY and AAAU.

Drawdown Indicators

	REPYY	AAAU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.56%	-21.63%	-43.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.30%	-19.13%	+1.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.63%	-19.13%	-15.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.71%	-20.94%	-14.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-65.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.73%	-16.84%	+10.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.99%	-6.18%	-9.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.19%	7.61%	-2.42%

Volatility

REPYY vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison

Repsol SA (REPYY) has a higher volatility of 9.66% compared to Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) at 5.76%. This indicates that REPYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	REPYY	AAAU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.66%	5.76%	+3.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.08%	22.92%	+2.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.30%	26.43%	+2.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.48%	17.85%	+10.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.31%	16.99%	+15.32%

Dividends

REPYY vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison

REPYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, while AAAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
AAAU Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
REPYY Repsol SA	4.37%	5.69%	8.07%	5.03%	4.22%	2.41%	8.21%	8.35%	2.97%	4.31%	3.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both REPYY and AAAU in my portfolio?

REPYY and AAAU have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, REPYY or AAAU?

REPYY has higher volatility (9.66%) compared to AAAU (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REPYY dropped -65.56% vs AAAU's -21.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

REPYY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.69 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.