PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RENW.L vs. DS2P.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RENW.L vs. DS2P.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (RENW.L) and L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DS2P.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RENW.L is traded in USD, while DS2P.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the DS2P.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RENW.L achieves a 22.11% return, which is significantly higher than DS2P.L's -11.05% return.


RENW.L

1D
-1.07%
1M
-10.32%
6M
13.78%
YTD
22.11%
1Y
44.29%
3Y*
13.16%
5Y*
5.30%
10Y*

DS2P.L

1D
0.35%
1M
-0.61%
6M
-0.58%
YTD
-11.05%
1Y
-7.24%
3Y*
-23.53%
5Y*
-20.52%
10Y*
-23.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RENW.L vs. DS2P.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RENW.L
L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
22.11%51.27%-14.25%-8.27%-8.82%-7.46%24.52%
DS2P.L
L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-11.05%-24.37%-29.54%-26.02%1.59%-36.55%-4.49%

Correlation

The correlation between RENW.L and DS2P.L is -0.51, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2020

-0.57

The correlation between RENW.L and DS2P.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.59 to -0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RENW.L vs. DS2P.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RENW.L
RENW.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
RENW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RENW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
RENW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
RENW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
RENW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

DS2P.L
DS2P.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
DS2P.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DS2P.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
DS2P.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
DS2P.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
DS2P.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RENW.L vs. DS2P.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (RENW.L) and L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DS2P.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RENW.LDS2P.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

0.99

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

-0.27

+2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.46

-0.58

+10.05

RENW.L vs. DS2P.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RENW.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the DS2P.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RENW.L and DS2P.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RENW.L vs. DS2P.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RENW.L drawdown since its inception was -48.58%, smaller than the maximum DS2P.L drawdown of -99.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RENW.L and DS2P.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RENW.LDS2P.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.58%

-99.69%

+51.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.56%

-26.76%

+10.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.48%

-64.94%

+32.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.77%

-76.19%

+32.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.56%

-99.67%

+83.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.61%

-89.77%

+66.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.67%

12.38%

-7.71%

Volatility

RENW.L vs. DS2P.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (RENW.L) and L&G DAX Daily 2x Short UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (DS2P.L) have volatilities of 8.97% and 9.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RENW.LDS2P.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.97%

9.17%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.81%

27.31%

-6.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.96%

33.48%

-7.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.75%

34.80%

-10.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.98%

37.18%

-12.20%

RENW.L vs. DS2P.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

RENW.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than DS2P.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

RENW.L vs. DS2P.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither RENW.L nor DS2P.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


RENW.L and DS2P.L have a correlation of -0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RENW.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RENW.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DS2P.L.

RENW.L is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while DS2P.L is Leveraged Equities. RENW.L tracks Solactive Clean Energy Index NTR, while DS2P.L tracks ShortDAX x2 Index Gross TR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for RENW.L and 0.50% for DS2P.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RENW.L and DS2P.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer