PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RENW.DE vs. XMLD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RENW.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENW.DE) and L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (XMLD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RENW.DE having a 43.00% return and XMLD.DE slightly lower at 42.18%.


RENW.DE

1D
-1.77%
1M
4.00%
YTD
43.00%
6M
41.28%
1Y
80.41%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*

XMLD.DE

1D
-0.78%
1M
19.30%
YTD
42.18%
6M
38.22%
1Y
72.24%
3Y*
33.99%
5Y*
19.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RENW.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RENW.DE
L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF
43.00%35.27%-9.64%-11.30%-3.32%1.09%18.53%
XMLD.DE
L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF
42.18%16.99%25.17%54.28%-36.45%19.09%9.25%

Correlation

The correlation between RENW.DE and XMLD.DE is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2020

0.64

The correlation between RENW.DE and XMLD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RENW.DE vs. XMLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RENW.DE
RENW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
RENW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RENW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
RENW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
RENW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
RENW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

XMLD.DE
XMLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
XMLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
XMLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RENW.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENW.DE) and L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (XMLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RENW.DEXMLD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.44

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.22

4.62

+4.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

34.50

12.52

+21.98

RENW.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RENW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.49, which is comparable to the XMLD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RENW.DE and XMLD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RENW.DEXMLD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.49

2.76

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.69

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.82

-0.33

Drawdowns

RENW.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RENW.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.93%, roughly equal to the maximum XMLD.DE drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RENW.DE and XMLD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RENW.DEXMLD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.93%

-42.81%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.63%

-15.80%

+7.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.00%

-33.67%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.30%

-42.81%

+0.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.64%

-2.30%

-1.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.33%

-13.51%

-3.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

5.84%

-3.53%

Volatility

RENW.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENW.DE) is 8.24%, while L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (XMLD.DE) has a volatility of 10.34%. This indicates that RENW.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RENW.DEXMLD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.24%

10.34%

-2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.85%

19.89%

-3.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.80%

26.47%

-3.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.02%

27.22%

-5.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.48%

28.52%

-6.04%

RENW.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RENW.DE and XMLD.DE have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Dividends

RENW.DE vs. XMLD.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither RENW.DE nor XMLD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


RENW.DE and XMLD.DE have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RENW.DE and XMLD.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

RENW.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while XMLD.DE is Technology Equities. RENW.DE tracks Solactive Clean Energy, while XMLD.DE tracks ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RENW.DE and XMLD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer