PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RENW.DE vs. WELP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RENW.DE vs. WELP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENW.DE) and HANetf HAN-GINS Indxx Healthcare Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF (WELP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RENW.DE achieves a 35.68% return, which is significantly higher than WELP.DE's 25.35% return.


RENW.DE

1D
-0.38%
1M
-8.57%
YTD
35.68%
6M
36.86%
1Y
70.59%
3Y*
14.98%
5Y*
7.10%
10Y*

WELP.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-7.19%
YTD
25.35%
6M
26.72%
1Y
34.31%
3Y*
12.49%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RENW.DE vs. WELP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
RENW.DE
L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF
35.68%35.23%-9.66%-11.28%-5.63%
WELP.DE
HANetf HAN-GINS Indxx Healthcare Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF
25.35%-1.54%7.90%0.25%5.34%

Correlation

The correlation between RENW.DE and WELP.DE is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2022

0.25

Over the past year, the correlation between RENW.DE and WELP.DE has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.25, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RENW.DE vs. WELP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RENW.DE
RENW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
RENW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RENW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
RENW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
RENW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RENW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

WELP.DE
WELP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
WELP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WELP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
WELP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
WELP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
WELP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RENW.DE vs. WELP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENW.DE) and HANetf HAN-GINS Indxx Healthcare Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF (WELP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RENW.DEWELP.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.31

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.64

2.80

+2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.78

8.57

+15.21

RENW.DE vs. WELP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RENW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is higher than the WELP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RENW.DE and WELP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RENW.DE vs. WELP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RENW.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.92%, which is greater than WELP.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RENW.DE and WELP.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RENW.DEWELP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.92%

-23.55%

-20.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.46%

-12.22%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.83%

-23.55%

-10.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.57%

-11.07%

+2.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.18%

-7.79%

-9.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

3.99%

-1.03%

Volatility

RENW.DE vs. WELP.DE - Volatility Comparison

L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENW.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.43% compared to HANetf HAN-GINS Indxx Healthcare Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF (WELP.DE) at 6.59%. This indicates that RENW.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WELP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RENW.DEWELP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.43%

6.59%

+1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.29%

16.90%

+1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.79%

19.54%

+4.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.22%

20.07%

+2.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.89%

20.07%

+2.82%

RENW.DE vs. WELP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RENW.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than WELP.DE's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

RENW.DE vs. WELP.DE - Dividend Comparison

RENW.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WELP.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%.


PositionTTM202520242023
RENW.DE
L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WELP.DE
HANetf HAN-GINS Indxx Healthcare Megatrend Equal Weight UCITS ETF
3.05%3.78%3.64%0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


RENW.DE and WELP.DE have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RENW.DE is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RENW.DE is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for WELP.DE.

RENW.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while WELP.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. RENW.DE tracks Solactive Clean Energy, while WELP.DE tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for RENW.DE and 0.59% for WELP.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RENW.DE and WELP.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer