RENW.DE vs. ETLF.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RENW.DE (L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF) and ETLF.DE (L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RENW.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Clean Energy, while ETLF.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RENW.DE returned 9.15%/yr vs 12.26%/yr for ETLF.DE. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RENW.DE charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for ETLF.DE.

Performance

RENW.DE vs. ETLF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENW.DE) and L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETLF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RENW.DE achieves a 43.00% return, which is significantly higher than ETLF.DE's 23.78% return.

RENW.DE

• 1D: -1.77%
• 1M: 4.00%
• YTD: 43.00%
• 6M: 41.28%
• 1Y: 80.41%
• 3Y*: 15.60%
• 5Y*: 9.15%
• 10Y*: —

ETLF.DE

• 1D: -1.48%
• 1M: -0.32%
• YTD: 23.78%
• 6M: 22.90%
• 1Y: 34.57%
• 3Y*: 12.51%
• 5Y*: 12.26%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RENW.DE vs. ETLF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
RENW.DE L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF	43.00%	35.27%	-9.64%	-11.30%	-3.32%	1.09%	18.53%
ETLF.DE L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF	23.78%	4.67%	10.97%	-10.24%	21.51%	40.15%	0.32%

Correlation

The correlation between RENW.DE and ETLF.DE is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2020	0.13

The correlation between RENW.DE and ETLF.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RENW.DE vs. ETLF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RENW.DE

RENW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 93
RENW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
RENW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
RENW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 89
RENW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
RENW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 96

ETLF.DE

ETLF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 58
ETLF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
ETLF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
ETLF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 56
ETLF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
ETLF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RENW.DE vs. ETLF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENW.DE) and L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETLF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RENW.DE	ETLF.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.49	1.86	+1.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.36	2.36	+2.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.34	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.22	3.96	+5.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	34.50	8.79	+25.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RENW.DE vs. ETLF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RENW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.49, which is higher than the ETLF.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RENW.DE and ETLF.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RENW.DE	ETLF.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.49	1.86	+1.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	0.71	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.53	-0.04

Drawdowns

RENW.DE vs. ETLF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RENW.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.93%, which is greater than ETLF.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RENW.DE and ETLF.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	RENW.DE	ETLF.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.93%	-28.78%	-15.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.63%	-8.80%	+0.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.00%	-15.96%	-19.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.30%	-27.00%	-15.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.64%	-4.91%	+1.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.33%	-12.13%	-5.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.31%	3.97%	-1.66%

Volatility

RENW.DE vs. ETLF.DE - Volatility Comparison

L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENW.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.24% compared to L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETLF.DE) at 5.93%. This indicates that RENW.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETLF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RENW.DE	ETLF.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.24%	5.93%	+2.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.85%	16.60%	+0.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.80%	18.79%	+4.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.02%	17.09%	+4.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.48%	15.59%	+6.89%

RENW.DE vs. ETLF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RENW.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ETLF.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

RENW.DE vs. ETLF.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither RENW.DE nor ETLF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RENW.DE and ETLF.DE in my portfolio?

RENW.DE and ETLF.DE have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RENW.DE or ETLF.DE?

On fees, ETLF.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RENW.DE or ETLF.DE?

ETLF.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for RENW.DE.

What is the main difference between RENW.DE and ETLF.DE?

RENW.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while ETLF.DE is Commodities. RENW.DE tracks Solactive Clean Energy, while ETLF.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for RENW.DE and 0.15% for ETLF.DE.