REMX vs. USO
REMX (VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - REMX is a Materials fund tracking the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, REMX returned 10.56%/yr vs 3.80%/yr for USO. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. REMX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.
Performance
REMX vs. USO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REMX achieves a 38.23% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 98.48% return. Over the past 10 years, REMX has outperformed USO with an annualized return of 10.56%, while USO has yielded a comparatively lower 3.80% annualized return.
REMX
- 1D
- 2.75%
- 1M
- -4.07%
- YTD
- 38.23%
- 6M
- 42.20%
- 1Y
- 188.69%
- 3Y*
- 8.22%
- 5Y*
- 5.89%
- 10Y*
- 10.56%
USO
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- -3.87%
- YTD
- 98.48%
- 6M
- 95.54%
- 1Y
- 97.37%
- 3Y*
- 28.86%
- 5Y*
- 23.92%
- 10Y*
- 3.80%
REMX vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REMX VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF | 38.23% | 92.95% | -35.02% | -19.18% | -31.13% | 79.81% | 64.82% | 0.74% | -49.63% | 82.60% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 98.48% | -8.46% | 13.35% | -4.94% | 28.97% | 64.68% | -67.79% | 32.61% | -19.57% | 2.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between REMX and USO is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2010 | 0.28 |
The correlation between REMX and USO shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REMX vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank
REMX
USO
REMX vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REMX | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.96 | 2.22 | +1.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.88 | 2.81 | +1.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.37 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.93 | 5.12 | +2.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.90 | 9.66 | +13.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REMX | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.96 | 2.22 | +1.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.67 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.10 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | -0.18 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
REMX vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REMX drawdown since its inception was -90.20%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMX and USO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REMX | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.20% | -98.19% | +7.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.35% | -20.39% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.11% | -26.05% | -36.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.34% | -36.23% | -37.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.34% | -86.75% | +13.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.21% | -85.39% | +32.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.87% | -75.30% | +8.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.09% | 10.81% | -2.72% |
Volatility
REMX vs. USO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) is 13.13%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 15.03%. This indicates that REMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REMX | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.13% | 15.03% | -1.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.60% | 38.18% | -3.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.95% | 44.26% | +3.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.21% | 36.04% | +4.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.92% | 39.00% | -2.08% |
REMX vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison
REMX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
REMX vs. USO - Dividend Comparison
REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REMX VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF | 1.27% | 1.76% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 5.25% | 0.81% | 1.64% | 12.43% | 2.89% | 2.23% | 4.77% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REMX and USO have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USO has higher volatility (15.03%) compared to REMX (13.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REMX dropped -90.20% vs USO's -98.19%.
On 10-year performance, REMX leads with 10.56% vs 3.80% for USO. On fees, REMX is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, REMX has been the lower-risk option at 13.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, REMX has performed better with a 10.56% return vs 3.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
REMX is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.
REMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.00% for USO.
REMX is categorized as Materials, while USO is Oil & Gas. REMX tracks MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index, while USO tracks Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for REMX and 0.86% for USO.
REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.96 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REMX and USO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer