PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REMX vs. IYH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REMX vs. IYH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REMX achieves a 18.26% return, which is significantly higher than IYH's -1.29% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with REMX having a 9.04% annualized return and IYH not far ahead at 9.38%.


REMX

1D
-1.32%
1M
-17.82%
YTD
18.26%
6M
21.26%
1Y
129.60%
3Y*
2.77%
5Y*
3.01%
10Y*
9.04%

IYH

1D
-0.28%
1M
6.02%
YTD
-1.29%
6M
0.79%
1Y
15.28%
3Y*
6.60%
5Y*
4.95%
10Y*
9.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REMX vs. IYH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
18.26%92.95%-35.02%-19.18%-31.13%79.81%64.82%0.74%-49.63%82.60%
IYH
iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF
-1.29%13.16%2.99%2.14%-4.46%23.41%15.56%20.80%5.80%22.27%

Correlation

The correlation between REMX and IYH is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2010

0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between REMX and IYH has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

REMX vs. IYH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
REMX
IYH

Basic Materials

100.0%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

100.0%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

REMX
100.0%
IYH

-

Communication Services

REMX

-

IYH

-

Consumer Cyclical

REMX

-

IYH

-

Consumer Defensive

REMX

-

IYH

-

Energy

REMX

-

IYH

-

Financial Services

REMX

-

IYH

-

Healthcare

REMX

-

IYH
100.0%

Industrials

REMX

-

IYH

-

Real Estate

REMX

-

IYH

-

Technology

REMX

-

IYH

-

Utilities

REMX

-

IYH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REMX vs. IYH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REMX
REMX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
REMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
REMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
REMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
REMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

IYH
IYH Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
IYH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYH Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
IYH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYH Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REMX vs. IYH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REMXIYHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.18

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.58

1.44

+4.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.61

3.45

+12.15

REMX vs. IYH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the IYH Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REMX and IYH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REMXIYHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

1.02

+1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.33

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.56

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

0.43

-0.53

Drawdowns

REMX vs. IYH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REMX drawdown since its inception was -90.20%, which is greater than IYH's maximum drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMX and IYH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REMXIYHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.20%

-43.12%

-47.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.35%

-10.64%

-12.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.11%

-17.91%

-44.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.34%

-17.91%

-55.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.34%

-28.40%

-44.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.97%

-4.56%

-55.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.86%

-8.96%

-57.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.34%

4.43%

+3.91%

Volatility

REMX vs. IYH - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has a higher volatility of 14.39% compared to iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) at 4.97%. This indicates that REMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REMXIYHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.39%

4.97%

+9.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.93%

10.67%

+25.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.92%

15.03%

+33.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.41%

14.97%

+25.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.04%

16.74%

+20.30%

REMX vs. IYH - Expense Ratio Comparison

REMX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IYH's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

REMX vs. IYH - Dividend Comparison

REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than IYH's 1.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYH
iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF
1.26%1.19%1.25%1.18%1.10%0.94%1.16%1.14%1.95%1.10%1.29%2.02%
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
1.49%1.76%2.56%0.00%1.56%5.25%0.81%1.64%12.43%2.89%2.23%4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


REMX and IYH have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REMX has higher volatility (14.39%) compared to IYH (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REMX dropped -90.20% vs IYH's -43.12%.

On 10-year performance, IYH leads with 9.38% vs 9.04% for REMX. On fees, IYH is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, IYH has been the lower-risk option at 4.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYH has performed better with a 9.38% return vs 9.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYH is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REMX.

REMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 1.26% for IYH.

REMX is categorized as Materials, while IYH is Health & Biotech Equities. REMX tracks MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index, while IYH tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for REMX and 0.43% for IYH.

REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REMX and IYH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer