PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REMX vs. COLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REMX vs. COLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REMX achieves a -5.51% return, which is significantly lower than COLO's 25.39% return. Over the past 10 years, REMX has underperformed COLO with an annualized return of 6.10%, while COLO has yielded a comparatively higher 6.73% annualized return.


REMX

1D
-3.88%
1M
-26.90%
6M
-21.68%
YTD
-5.51%
1Y
39.98%
3Y*
-4.09%
5Y*
-5.34%
10Y*
6.10%
ALL TIME*
-5.02%

COLO

1D
0.27%
1M
1.43%
6M
11.05%
YTD
25.39%
1Y
56.44%
3Y*
33.47%
5Y*
18.08%
10Y*
6.73%
ALL TIME*
5.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REMX vs. COLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
-5.51%92.95%-35.02%-19.18%-31.13%79.81%64.82%0.74%-49.63%82.60%
COLO
Global X MSCI Colombia ETF
25.39%68.88%4.68%24.92%-21.32%-11.50%-14.60%30.42%-19.88%11.88%

Correlation

The correlation between REMX and COLO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2010

0.45

The correlation between REMX and COLO shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

REMX vs. COLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
REMX
COLO

Basic Materials

100.0%
18.4%

Communication Services

-

2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

15.2%

Financial Services

-

40.5%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

2.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

19.6%

Basic Materials

REMX
100.0%
COLO
18.4%

Communication Services

REMX

-

COLO
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

REMX

-

COLO
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

REMX

-

COLO

-

Energy

REMX

-

COLO
15.2%

Financial Services

REMX

-

COLO
40.5%

Healthcare

REMX

-

COLO

-

Industrials

REMX

-

COLO
2.0%

Real Estate

REMX

-

COLO

-

Technology

REMX

-

COLO

-

Utilities

REMX

-

COLO
19.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REMX vs. COLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REMX
REMX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
REMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
REMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
REMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
REMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

COLO
COLO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
COLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
COLO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
COLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
COLO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REMX vs. COLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REMXCOLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.42

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

3.19

-2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.56

8.55

-4.99

REMX vs. COLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the COLO Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REMX and COLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REMX vs. COLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REMX drawdown since its inception was -90.20%, which is greater than COLO's maximum drawdown of -78.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMX and COLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REMXCOLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.20%

-78.91%

-11.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.23%

-17.79%

-18.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.68%

-18.35%

-41.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.34%

-43.86%

-29.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.34%

-62.75%

-10.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.01%

-14.88%

-53.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.80%

-40.16%

-26.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.26%

6.63%

+4.63%

Volatility

REMX vs. COLO - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has a higher volatility of 11.40% compared to Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) at 5.16%. This indicates that REMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REMXCOLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.40%

5.16%

+6.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.34%

19.75%

+17.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.96%

23.29%

+26.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.69%

23.27%

+17.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.26%

25.38%

+11.88%

REMX vs. COLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

REMX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than COLO's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

REMX vs. COLO - Dividend Comparison

REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than COLO's 4.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COLO
Global X MSCI Colombia ETF
4.48%7.51%6.08%6.99%12.55%2.32%3.23%3.04%3.03%1.83%1.48%1.58%
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
1.86%1.76%2.56%0.00%1.56%5.25%0.81%1.64%12.43%2.89%2.23%4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


REMX and COLO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REMX has higher volatility (11.40%) compared to COLO (5.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REMX dropped -90.20% vs COLO's -78.91%.

On 10-year performance, COLO leads with 6.73% vs 6.10% for REMX. On fees, REMX is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, COLO has been the lower-risk option at 5.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, COLO has performed better with a 6.73% return vs 6.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

REMX is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for COLO.

COLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.48%, compared with 1.86% for REMX.

REMX is categorized as Rare Earth & Strategic Metals, while COLO is Latin America Equities. REMX tracks MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index, while COLO tracks MSCI All Colombia Select 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for REMX and 0.62% for COLO.

COLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REMX and COLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer