PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REMX vs. ARKQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REMX vs. ARKQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REMX achieves a 31.07% return, which is significantly higher than ARKQ's 17.47% return. Over the past 10 years, REMX has underperformed ARKQ with an annualized return of 10.15%, while ARKQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.08% annualized return.


REMX

1D
1.46%
1M
0.33%
YTD
31.07%
6M
39.68%
1Y
148.89%
3Y*
5.34%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*
10.15%

ARKQ

1D
4.08%
1M
1.98%
YTD
17.47%
6M
19.36%
1Y
64.14%
3Y*
34.41%
5Y*
11.10%
10Y*
22.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REMX vs. ARKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
31.07%92.95%-35.02%-19.18%-31.13%79.81%64.82%0.74%-49.63%82.60%
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
17.47%48.81%33.88%40.70%-46.75%1.74%107.20%25.94%-7.89%52.26%

Correlation

The correlation between REMX and ARKQ is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014

0.51

The correlation between REMX and ARKQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

REMX vs. ARKQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
REMX
ARKQ

Basic Materials

100.0%

-

Communication Services

-

9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

13.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

1.7%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

1.1%

Industrials

-

39.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

34.2%

Utilities

-

1.0%

Basic Materials

REMX
100.0%
ARKQ

-

Communication Services

REMX

-

ARKQ
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

REMX

-

ARKQ
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

REMX

-

ARKQ

-

Energy

REMX

-

ARKQ
1.7%

Financial Services

REMX

-

ARKQ

-

Healthcare

REMX

-

ARKQ
1.1%

Industrials

REMX

-

ARKQ
39.0%

Real Estate

REMX

-

ARKQ

-

Technology

REMX

-

ARKQ
34.2%

Utilities

REMX

-

ARKQ
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REMX vs. ARKQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REMX
REMX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
REMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
REMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
REMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
REMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

ARKQ
ARKQ Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ARKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REMX vs. ARKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REMXARKQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.30

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.41

3.13

+3.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.25

9.22

+8.04

REMX vs. ARKQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is higher than the ARKQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REMX and ARKQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REMX vs. ARKQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REMX drawdown since its inception was -90.20%, which is greater than ARKQ's maximum drawdown of -59.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMX and ARKQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REMXARKQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.20%

-59.89%

-30.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.35%

-20.58%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.11%

-30.76%

-31.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.34%

-55.71%

-17.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.34%

-59.89%

-13.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.63%

-6.35%

-49.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.83%

-17.21%

-49.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.66%

6.98%

+1.68%

Volatility

REMX vs. ARKQ - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has a higher volatility of 16.59% compared to ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) at 13.37%. This indicates that REMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARKQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REMXARKQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.59%

13.37%

+3.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.16%

26.41%

+10.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.84%

33.76%

+16.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.64%

32.56%

+8.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.15%

30.01%

+7.14%

REMX vs. ARKQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

REMX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKQ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

REMX vs. ARKQ - Dividend Comparison

REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than ARKQ's 0.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
0.23%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.80%0.86%0.00%2.86%1.54%0.00%0.98%
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
1.34%1.76%2.56%0.00%1.56%5.25%0.81%1.64%12.43%2.89%2.23%4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


REMX and ARKQ have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REMX has higher volatility (16.59%) compared to ARKQ (13.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REMX dropped -90.20% vs ARKQ's -59.89%.

On 10-year performance, ARKQ leads with 22.08% vs 10.15% for REMX. On fees, REMX is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, ARKQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ARKQ has performed better with a 22.08% return vs 10.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

REMX is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKQ.

REMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.23% for ARKQ.

REMX is categorized as Rare Earth & Strategic Metals, while ARKQ is Robotics. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for REMX and 0.75% for ARKQ.

REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REMX and ARKQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer