PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REMVX vs. TEQLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REMVX vs. TEQLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RBC Emerging Markets Value Equity Fund (REMVX) and TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (TEQLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REMVX achieves a 22.10% return, which is significantly higher than TEQLX's 20.73% return.


REMVX

1D
0.36%
1M
-4.16%
6M
14.99%
YTD
22.10%
1Y
46.14%
3Y*
23.41%
5Y*
10.16%
10Y*

TEQLX

1D
0.24%
1M
-4.35%
6M
13.91%
YTD
20.73%
1Y
37.51%
3Y*
20.01%
5Y*
6.95%
10Y*
9.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REMVX vs. TEQLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
REMVX
RBC Emerging Markets Value Equity Fund
22.10%47.31%4.58%11.03%-16.99%3.71%18.03%16.00%-11.48%
TEQLX
TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund
20.73%34.10%6.71%9.23%-20.22%-3.07%17.67%18.59%-9.31%

Correlation

The correlation between REMVX and TEQLX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018

0.95

The correlation between REMVX and TEQLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REMVX vs. TEQLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REMVX
REMVX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
REMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
REMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
REMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
REMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

TEQLX
TEQLX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
TEQLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEQLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEQLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
TEQLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEQLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REMVX vs. TEQLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Emerging Markets Value Equity Fund (REMVX) and TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (TEQLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REMVXTEQLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.33

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

2.85

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.95

9.78

+1.17

REMVX vs. TEQLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REMVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the TEQLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REMVX and TEQLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REMVX vs. TEQLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REMVX drawdown since its inception was -36.92%, smaller than the maximum TEQLX drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMVX and TEQLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REMVXTEQLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.92%

-39.33%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.08%

-13.32%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.15%

-15.97%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.45%

-34.64%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.63%

-7.53%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.26%

-14.53%

+3.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.25%

3.87%

+0.38%

Volatility

REMVX vs. TEQLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RBC Emerging Markets Value Equity Fund (REMVX) is 9.52%, while TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (TEQLX) has a volatility of 10.43%. This indicates that REMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEQLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REMVXTEQLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.52%

10.43%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.56%

20.13%

+0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.35%

22.01%

+0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.91%

17.91%

+1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.04%

18.01%

+2.03%

REMVX vs. TEQLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

REMVX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TEQLX's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

REMVX vs. TEQLX - Dividend Comparison

REMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than TEQLX's 2.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REMVX
RBC Emerging Markets Value Equity Fund
1.67%2.03%5.02%4.02%7.02%13.30%0.38%3.82%2.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TEQLX
TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund
2.34%2.83%2.93%3.08%2.51%2.27%2.04%2.77%2.43%1.98%1.88%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, REMVX and TEQLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TEQLX has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to REMVX (9.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REMVX dropped -36.92% vs TEQLX's -39.33%.

REMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REMVX and TEQLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer