REMVX vs. RIBIX
REMVX (RBC Emerging Markets Value Equity Fund) and RIBIX (RBC Impact Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - REMVX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund managed by RBC, while RIBIX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by RBC. Over the past 5 years, REMVX returned 10.34%/yr vs -1.65%/yr for RIBIX. Their -0.01 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. REMVX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for RIBIX.
Performance
REMVX vs. RIBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REMVX achieves a 20.34% return, which is significantly higher than RIBIX's -3.44% return.
REMVX
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- YTD
- 20.34%
- 1Y
- 46.60%
- 3Y*
- 22.47%
- 5Y*
- 10.34%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.04%
RIBIX
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- 6M
- -3.09%
- YTD
- -3.44%
- 1Y
- -2.03%
- 3Y*
- 2.32%
- 5Y*
- -1.65%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.65%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
RIBIX RBC Impact Bond Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
REMVX vs. RIBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REMVX RBC Emerging Markets Value Equity Fund | 20.34% | 47.31% | 4.58% | 11.03% | -16.99% | 3.71% | 18.03% | 16.00% | -11.48% |
RIBIX RBC Impact Bond Fund | -3.44% | 5.95% | 1.11% | 5.50% | -14.47% | -1.86% | 7.98% | 7.53% | 1.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between REMVX and RIBIX is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018 | -0.01 |
The correlation between REMVX and RIBIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REMVX vs. RIBIX — Risk / Return Rank
REMVX
RIBIX
REMVX vs. RIBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Emerging Markets Value Equity Fund (REMVX) and RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REMVX | RIBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 0.96 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | -0.27 | +3.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.55 | -0.70 | +10.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REMVX vs. RIBIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REMVX drawdown since its inception was -36.92%, which is greater than RIBIX's maximum drawdown of -19.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMVX and RIBIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REMVX | RIBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.92% | -19.37% | -17.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.08% | -4.21% | -10.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.15% | -5.25% | -12.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.45% | -18.83% | -14.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.96% | -8.67% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.26% | -6.45% | -4.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.78% | 1.61% | +3.17% |
Volatility
REMVX vs. RIBIX - Volatility Comparison
RBC Emerging Markets Value Equity Fund (REMVX) has a higher volatility of 9.05% compared to RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX) at 1.03%. This indicates that REMVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REMVX | RIBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.05% | 1.03% | +8.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.36% | 3.06% | +18.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.23% | 4.15% | +19.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.04% | 5.97% | +13.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.12% | 5.16% | +14.96% |
REMVX vs. RIBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
REMVX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than RIBIX's 0.73% expense ratio.
Dividends
REMVX vs. RIBIX - Dividend Comparison
REMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than RIBIX's 3.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REMVX RBC Emerging Markets Value Equity Fund | 1.69% | 2.03% | 5.02% | 4.02% | 7.02% | 13.30% | 0.38% | 3.82% | 2.51% | 0.00% |
RIBIX RBC Impact Bond Fund | 3.42% | 4.02% | 3.35% | 2.50% | 2.10% | 1.94% | 3.28% | 3.91% | 2.44% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REMVX and RIBIX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
REMVX has higher volatility (9.05%) compared to RIBIX (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REMVX dropped -36.92% vs RIBIX's -19.37%.
REMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REMVX and RIBIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer