REMVX vs. RIBIX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about RBC Emerging Markets Value Equity Fund (REMVX) and RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX).

REMVX is managed by RBC Global Asset Management.. It was launched on Feb 8, 2018. RIBIX is managed by RBC Global Asset Management.. It was launched on Dec 18, 2017.

Performance

REMVX vs. RIBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RBC Emerging Markets Value Equity Fund (REMVX) and RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

REMVX vs. RIBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
REMVX RBC Emerging Markets Value Equity Fund	4.24%	47.31%	4.58%	11.03%	-16.99%	3.71%	18.03%	16.00%	-11.48%
RIBIX RBC Impact Bond Fund	-0.92%	5.95%	1.11%	5.50%	-14.47%	-1.86%	7.98%	7.53%	1.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REMVX achieves a 4.24% return, which is significantly higher than RIBIX's -0.92% return.

REMVX

• 1D: 3.15%
• 1M: -10.27%
• YTD: 4.24%
• 6M: 13.05%
• 1Y: 43.84%
• 3Y*: 19.40%
• 5Y*: 7.18%
• 10Y*: —

RIBIX

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -1.62%
• YTD: -0.92%
• 6M: -0.38%
• 1Y: 1.63%
• 3Y*: 2.74%
• 5Y*: -0.68%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REMVX vs. RIBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

REMVX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than RIBIX's 0.73% expense ratio.

REMVX

RBC Emerging Markets Value Equity Fund

RIBIX

RBC Impact Bond Fund

Return for Risk

REMVX vs. RIBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REMVX

REMVX Risk / Return Rank: 92
REMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
REMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
REMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
REMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
REMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

RIBIX

RIBIX Risk / Return Rank: 17
RIBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
RIBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
RIBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
RIBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
RIBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REMVX vs. RIBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Emerging Markets Value Equity Fund (REMVX) and RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	REMVX	RIBIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	0.42	+1.93
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	0.61	+2.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.08	+0.38
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.72	1.10	+1.61
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.14	2.72	+8.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

REMVX vs. RIBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REMVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the RIBIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REMVX and RIBIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	REMVX	RIBIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35	0.42	+1.93
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	-0.12	+0.53
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.19	+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between REMVX and RIBIX is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

REMVX vs. RIBIX - Dividend Comparison

REMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than RIBIX's 3.77% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
REMVX RBC Emerging Markets Value Equity Fund	1.95%	2.03%	5.02%	4.02%	7.02%	13.30%	0.38%	3.82%	2.51%	0.00%
RIBIX RBC Impact Bond Fund	3.77%	4.02%	3.35%	2.50%	2.10%	1.94%	3.28%	3.91%	2.44%	0.05%

Drawdowns

REMVX vs. RIBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REMVX drawdown since its inception was -36.92%, which is greater than RIBIX's maximum drawdown of -19.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMVX and RIBIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	REMVX	RIBIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.92%	-19.37%	-17.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.08%	-2.88%	-12.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.42%	-18.98%	-17.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.41%	-6.29%	-6.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.54%	-6.43%	-5.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.68%	1.17%	+2.51%

Volatility

REMVX vs. RIBIX - Volatility Comparison

RBC Emerging Markets Value Equity Fund (REMVX) has a higher volatility of 10.22% compared to RBC Impact Bond Fund (RIBIX) at 1.67%. This indicates that REMVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	REMVX	RIBIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.22%	1.67%	+8.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.98%	2.74%	+11.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.99%	4.76%	+14.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.57%	5.94%	+11.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.49%	5.20%	+14.29%