PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REMSX vs. TEQLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REMSX vs. TEQLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund (REMSX) and TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (TEQLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with REMSX having a 29.25% return and TEQLX slightly lower at 29.20%. Over the past 10 years, REMSX has underperformed TEQLX with an annualized return of 9.68%, while TEQLX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.56% annualized return.


REMSX

1D
-0.99%
1M
7.90%
YTD
29.25%
6M
31.12%
1Y
55.68%
3Y*
24.75%
5Y*
7.47%
10Y*
9.68%

TEQLX

1D
-0.71%
1M
8.36%
YTD
29.20%
6M
32.06%
1Y
56.15%
3Y*
24.65%
5Y*
7.60%
10Y*
10.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REMSX vs. TEQLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REMSX
Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund
29.25%33.98%8.16%8.37%-22.59%0.75%9.85%19.11%-16.74%35.45%
TEQLX
TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund
29.20%34.10%6.71%9.23%-20.22%-3.07%17.67%18.59%-14.60%37.47%

Correlation

The correlation between REMSX and TEQLX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2010

0.96

The correlation between REMSX and TEQLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REMSX vs. TEQLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REMSX
REMSX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
REMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
REMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
REMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
REMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

TEQLX
TEQLX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
TEQLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEQLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEQLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
TEQLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEQLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REMSX vs. TEQLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund (REMSX) and TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (TEQLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REMSXTEQLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.60

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.15

4.40

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.39

17.41

-1.02

REMSX vs. TEQLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REMSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.35, which is comparable to the TEQLX Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REMSX and TEQLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REMSXTEQLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.35

3.26

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.45

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.60

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.35

-0.06

Drawdowns

REMSX vs. TEQLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REMSX drawdown since its inception was -66.80%, which is greater than TEQLX's maximum drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMSX and TEQLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REMSXTEQLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.80%

-39.33%

-27.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.87%

-13.32%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.56%

-15.97%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.33%

-37.05%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.09%

-39.33%

-1.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-0.71%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.34%

-14.60%

-4.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

3.35%

+0.16%

Volatility

REMSX vs. TEQLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund (REMSX) is 7.39%, while TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund (TEQLX) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that REMSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEQLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REMSXTEQLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.39%

7.82%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.70%

15.45%

-0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.19%

17.99%

-0.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

16.98%

-0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.34%

17.68%

-0.34%

REMSX vs. TEQLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

REMSX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than TEQLX's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

REMSX vs. TEQLX - Dividend Comparison

REMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than TEQLX's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REMSX
Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund
1.52%1.97%2.58%2.42%2.17%14.04%0.59%2.51%4.57%1.10%1.08%0.13%
TEQLX
TIAA-CREF Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund
2.19%2.83%2.93%3.08%2.51%2.27%2.04%2.77%2.43%1.98%1.88%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, REMSX and TEQLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TEQLX has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to REMSX (7.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REMSX dropped -66.80% vs TEQLX's -39.33%.

REMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 3.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REMSX and TEQLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer