PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REMSX vs. RSEAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REMSX vs. RSEAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund (REMSX) and Russell Investments U.S. Strategic Equity Fund (RSEAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REMSX achieves a 29.25% return, which is significantly higher than RSEAX's 8.87% return. Over the past 10 years, REMSX has underperformed RSEAX with an annualized return of 9.68%, while RSEAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.99% annualized return.


REMSX

1D
-0.99%
1M
7.90%
YTD
29.25%
6M
31.12%
1Y
55.68%
3Y*
24.75%
5Y*
7.47%
10Y*
9.68%

RSEAX

1D
-0.76%
1M
3.63%
YTD
8.87%
6M
8.68%
1Y
23.24%
3Y*
19.22%
5Y*
9.97%
10Y*
12.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REMSX vs. RSEAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REMSX
Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund
29.25%33.98%8.16%8.37%-22.59%0.75%9.85%19.11%-16.74%35.45%
RSEAX
Russell Investments U.S. Strategic Equity Fund
8.87%14.44%19.90%26.15%-21.05%20.19%23.44%29.58%-9.98%20.77%

Correlation

The correlation between REMSX and RSEAX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.66

The correlation between REMSX and RSEAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REMSX vs. RSEAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REMSX
REMSX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
REMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
REMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
REMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
REMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

RSEAX
RSEAX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
RSEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RSEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REMSX vs. RSEAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund (REMSX) and Russell Investments U.S. Strategic Equity Fund (RSEAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REMSXRSEAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.36

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.15

2.56

+1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.39

10.92

+5.47

REMSX vs. RSEAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REMSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.35, which is higher than the RSEAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REMSX and RSEAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REMSXRSEAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.35

1.99

+1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.54

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.69

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.70

-0.41

Drawdowns

REMSX vs. RSEAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REMSX drawdown since its inception was -66.80%, which is greater than RSEAX's maximum drawdown of -34.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMSX and RSEAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REMSXRSEAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.80%

-34.37%

-32.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.87%

-9.19%

-4.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.56%

-25.68%

+9.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.33%

-27.52%

-9.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.09%

-34.37%

-6.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-0.92%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.34%

-4.91%

-14.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

2.15%

+1.36%

Volatility

REMSX vs. RSEAX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund (REMSX) has a higher volatility of 7.39% compared to Russell Investments U.S. Strategic Equity Fund (RSEAX) at 2.86%. This indicates that REMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSEAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REMSXRSEAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.39%

2.86%

+4.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.70%

8.87%

+5.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.19%

11.83%

+5.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

18.47%

-1.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.34%

18.86%

-1.52%

REMSX vs. RSEAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

REMSX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than RSEAX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

REMSX vs. RSEAX - Dividend Comparison

REMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than RSEAX's 10.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REMSX
Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund
1.52%1.97%2.58%2.42%2.17%14.04%0.59%2.51%4.57%1.10%1.08%0.13%
RSEAX
Russell Investments U.S. Strategic Equity Fund
10.75%11.81%10.74%4.04%6.61%7.64%0.52%5.07%23.30%9.12%5.47%6.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


REMSX and RSEAX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REMSX has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to RSEAX (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REMSX dropped -66.80% vs RSEAX's -34.37%.

REMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REMSX and RSEAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer