PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REMSX vs. EMPTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REMSX vs. EMPTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund (REMSX) and UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund (EMPTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with REMSX having a 22.80% return and EMPTX slightly lower at 22.43%.


REMSX

1D
0.75%
1M
-1.91%
6M
17.52%
YTD
22.80%
1Y
40.69%
3Y*
22.34%
5Y*
7.21%
10Y*
8.68%

EMPTX

1D
-0.85%
1M
-1.98%
6M
17.84%
YTD
22.43%
1Y
47.10%
3Y*
24.41%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REMSX vs. EMPTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
REMSX
Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund
22.80%33.98%8.16%8.37%-22.59%0.75%9.85%19.11%-15.46%
EMPTX
UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund
22.43%43.82%2.51%8.92%-25.38%-9.36%24.79%14.98%0.55%

Correlation

The correlation between REMSX and EMPTX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2018

0.81

The correlation between REMSX and EMPTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REMSX vs. EMPTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REMSX
REMSX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
REMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
REMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
REMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
REMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

EMPTX
EMPTX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EMPTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMPTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMPTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EMPTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMPTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REMSX vs. EMPTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund (REMSX) and UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund (EMPTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REMSXEMPTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.43

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

3.61

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.55

13.02

-2.47

REMSX vs. EMPTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REMSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the EMPTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REMSX and EMPTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REMSX vs. EMPTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REMSX drawdown since its inception was -66.80%, which is greater than EMPTX's maximum drawdown of -46.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMSX and EMPTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REMSXEMPTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.80%

-46.03%

-20.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.87%

-14.50%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.56%

-15.50%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.67%

-39.59%

+3.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.10%

-6.94%

+0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.30%

-18.19%

-1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

3.87%

-0.04%

Volatility

REMSX vs. EMPTX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund (REMSX) and UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund (EMPTX) have volatilities of 9.98% and 9.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REMSXEMPTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.98%

9.79%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.34%

19.68%

-1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.22%

22.01%

-1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.21%

19.92%

-2.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.56%

19.68%

-2.12%

REMSX vs. EMPTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

REMSX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than EMPTX's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

REMSX vs. EMPTX - Dividend Comparison

REMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, more than EMPTX's 1.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMPTX
UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund
1.56%1.91%3.40%3.20%3.84%11.93%1.50%2.75%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%
REMSX
Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund
1.60%1.97%2.58%2.42%2.17%14.04%0.59%2.51%4.57%1.10%1.08%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


REMSX and EMPTX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REMSX has higher volatility (9.98%) compared to EMPTX (9.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REMSX dropped -66.80% vs EMPTX's -46.03%.

EMPTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REMSX and EMPTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer