REMC vs. SRHQ

Last updated Jul 24, 2026

REMC (Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF) and SRHQ (SRH U.S. Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REMC is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Beta Advantage Research Enhanced Mid Cap Index, while SRHQ is a Quality Factor fund tracking the SRH US Quality Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. REMC charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SRHQ.

Performance

REMC vs. SRHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (REMC) and SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REMC achieves a 11.24% return, which is significantly lower than SRHQ's 17.26% return.

REMC

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 2.15%
• 6M: 8.12%
• YTD: 11.24%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

SRHQ

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 4.44%
• 6M: 12.89%
• YTD: 17.26%
• 1Y: 22.20%
• 3Y*: 15.92%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
REMC Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF	$8.40K	$7.62K	$6.34K
SRHQ SRH U.S. Quality ETF	$5.57K	$11.42K	$13.36K

REMC vs. SRHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
REMC Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF	11.24%	-1.99%
SRHQ SRH U.S. Quality ETF	17.26%	-0.96%

Correlation

The correlation between REMC and SRHQ is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025	0.80

Return for Risk

REMC vs. SRHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REMC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SRHQ

SRHQ Risk / Return Rank: 72
SRHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
SRHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
SRHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 58
SRHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
SRHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REMC vs. SRHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (REMC) and SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	REMC	SRHQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.51	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.18	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.26	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.54	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.51	—

Drawdowns

REMC vs. SRHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REMC drawdown since its inception was -6.64%, smaller than the maximum SRHQ drawdown of -18.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMC and SRHQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	REMC	SRHQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.64%	-18.50%	+11.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.31%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.50%	-2.82%	+1.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.37%	-3.00%	+1.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.81%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	REMC	SRHQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.03%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.90%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.97%	14.85%	-2.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.97%	15.95%	-3.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.97%	15.95%	-3.98%

REMC vs. SRHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

REMC has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than SRHQ's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

REMC vs. SRHQ - Dividend Comparison

REMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than SRHQ's 0.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
REMC Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF	0.08%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SRHQ SRH U.S. Quality ETF	0.71%	0.76%	0.66%	0.84%	0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both REMC and SRHQ in my portfolio?

REMC and SRHQ have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, REMC or SRHQ?

On fees, REMC is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, REMC or SRHQ?

REMC is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SRHQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, REMC or SRHQ?

SRHQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.08% for REMC.

What is the main difference between REMC and SRHQ?

REMC is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SRHQ is Quality Factor. REMC tracks Beta Advantage Research Enhanced Mid Cap Index, while SRHQ tracks SRH US Quality Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and SRH. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for REMC and 0.35% for SRHQ.