PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REM vs. USRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REM vs. USRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF (REM) and iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REM achieves a -2.10% return, which is significantly lower than USRT's 12.59% return. Over the past 10 years, REM has underperformed USRT with an annualized return of 2.55%, while USRT has yielded a comparatively higher 6.21% annualized return.


REM

1D
-1.24%
1M
-4.86%
YTD
-2.10%
6M
-2.10%
1Y
11.53%
3Y*
8.00%
5Y*
-2.48%
10Y*
2.55%

USRT

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
12.59%
6M
11.36%
1Y
15.26%
3Y*
11.53%
5Y*
4.73%
10Y*
6.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REM vs. USRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REM
iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF
-2.10%13.30%-1.00%14.43%-27.56%16.14%-19.99%21.34%-3.09%18.43%
USRT
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF
12.59%2.44%8.58%13.64%-24.43%43.26%-8.06%25.98%-4.67%5.27%

Correlation

The correlation between REM and USRT is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2007

0.64

The correlation between REM and USRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

REM vs. USRT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
REM
USRT

Real Estate

97.2%
99.4%

Financial Services

2.4%
0.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

REM
97.2%
USRT
99.4%

Financial Services

REM
2.4%
USRT
0.1%

Basic Materials

REM

-

USRT

-

Communication Services

REM

-

USRT

-

Consumer Cyclical

REM

-

USRT

-

Consumer Defensive

REM

-

USRT

-

Energy

REM

-

USRT

-

Healthcare

REM

-

USRT

-

Industrials

REM

-

USRT

-

Technology

REM

-

USRT

-

Utilities

REM

-

USRT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REM vs. USRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REM
REM Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
REM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
REM Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
REM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
REM Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

USRT
USRT Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
USRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
USRT Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
USRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
USRT Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REM vs. USRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF (REM) and iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REMUSRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.20

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.81

1.91

-1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.33

6.15

-3.81

REM vs. USRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REM Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the USRT Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REM and USRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REMUSRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

1.15

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

0.25

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

0.29

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

0.18

-0.23

Drawdowns

REM vs. USRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REM drawdown since its inception was -74.73%, which is greater than USRT's maximum drawdown of -69.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REM and USRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REMUSRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.73%

-69.91%

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.25%

-8.04%

-6.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.91%

-18.70%

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.31%

-31.03%

-12.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.52%

-44.38%

-24.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.85%

-3.01%

-20.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.35%

-12.97%

-25.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.95%

2.49%

+2.46%

Volatility

REM vs. USRT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF (REM) and iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) have volatilities of 3.81% and 3.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REMUSRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

3.92%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.01%

9.25%

+3.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.85%

13.28%

+3.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.57%

18.89%

+4.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.27%

21.28%

+6.99%

REM vs. USRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

REM has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than USRT's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

REM vs. USRT - Dividend Comparison

REM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.19%, more than USRT's 2.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REM
iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF
9.19%8.70%9.61%9.46%11.13%7.29%7.72%8.16%10.00%9.97%10.03%11.99%
USRT
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF
2.67%3.07%2.85%3.18%3.46%2.27%3.12%3.34%5.66%3.44%3.98%3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


REM and USRT have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USRT has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to REM (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REM dropped -74.73% vs USRT's -69.91%.

On 10-year performance, USRT leads with 6.21% vs 2.55% for REM. On fees, USRT is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, REM has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, USRT has performed better with a 6.21% return vs 2.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USRT is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for REM.

REM has the higher dividend yield at 9.19%, compared with 2.67% for USRT.

REM tracks FTSE NAREIT All Mortgage Capped Index, while USRT tracks FTSE NAREIT Equity REITs Index. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for REM and 0.08% for USRT.

USRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REM and USRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer