PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REM vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REM vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF (REM) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REM achieves a -0.15% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -13.49% return. Over the past 10 years, REM has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 2.86%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.68% annualized return.


REM

1D
0.94%
1M
1.19%
YTD
-0.15%
6M
0.03%
1Y
11.49%
3Y*
8.08%
5Y*
-2.46%
10Y*
2.86%

SLV

1D
-5.40%
1M
-18.48%
YTD
-13.49%
6M
-14.05%
1Y
69.08%
3Y*
39.38%
5Y*
18.31%
10Y*
12.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REM vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REM
iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF
-0.15%13.30%-1.00%14.43%-27.56%16.14%-19.99%21.34%-3.09%18.43%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-13.49%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between REM and SLV is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2007

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REM vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REM
REM Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
REM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
REM Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
REM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
REM Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REM vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF (REM) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REMSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.25

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.81

1.47

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.18

3.16

-0.99

REM vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REM Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REM and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REM vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REM drawdown since its inception was -74.73%, roughly equal to the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REM and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REMSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.73%

-76.28%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.25%

-47.23%

+32.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.91%

-47.23%

+25.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.31%

-47.23%

+3.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.52%

-47.23%

-21.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.34%

-47.23%

+24.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.30%

-44.65%

+6.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.29%

21.91%

-16.62%

Volatility

REM vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF (REM) is 4.80%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 14.34%. This indicates that REM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REMSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

14.34%

-9.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.38%

59.27%

-45.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.01%

60.33%

-43.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.57%

36.59%

-13.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.31%

32.09%

-3.78%

REM vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

REM has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

REM vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

REM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.02%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REM
iShares Mortgage Real Estate ETF
9.02%8.70%9.61%9.46%11.13%7.29%7.72%8.16%10.00%9.97%10.03%11.99%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


REM and SLV have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (14.34%) compared to REM (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REM dropped -74.73% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 12.68% vs 2.86% for REM. On fees, REM is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, REM has been the lower-risk option at 4.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 12.68% return vs 2.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

REM is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

REM has the higher dividend yield at 9.02%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

REM is categorized as REIT, while SLV is Silver. REM tracks FTSE NAREIT All Mortgage Capped Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for REM and 0.50% for SLV.

SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REM and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer