RELVX vs. RMLVX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RELVX (Russell Investments LifePoints Equity Growth Strategy Fund) and RMLVX (Russell Investments LifePoints Moderate Strategy Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from Russell. Over the past 10 years, RELVX returned 9.59%/yr vs 4.39%/yr for RMLVX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RELVX charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for RMLVX.

Performance

RELVX vs. RMLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments LifePoints Equity Growth Strategy Fund (RELVX) and Russell Investments LifePoints Moderate Strategy Fund (RMLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RELVX achieves a 10.07% return, which is significantly higher than RMLVX's 4.70% return. Over the past 10 years, RELVX has outperformed RMLVX with an annualized return of 9.59%, while RMLVX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.39% annualized return.

RELVX

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.99%
• YTD: 10.07%
• 6M: 9.45%
• 1Y: 23.68%
• 3Y*: 16.98%
• 5Y*: 9.01%
• 10Y*: 9.59%

RMLVX

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 0.85%
• YTD: 4.70%
• 6M: 4.50%
• 1Y: 12.63%
• 3Y*: 9.45%
• 5Y*: 3.57%
• 10Y*: 4.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RELVX vs. RMLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RELVX Russell Investments LifePoints Equity Growth Strategy Fund	10.07%	18.70%	12.82%	18.70%	-17.25%	20.58%	4.04%	18.42%	-9.80%	15.56%
RMLVX Russell Investments LifePoints Moderate Strategy Fund	4.70%	11.85%	6.00%	10.66%	-15.32%	8.08%	3.06%	10.54%	-4.74%	8.24%

Correlation

The correlation between RELVX and RMLVX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1999	0.92

The correlation between RELVX and RMLVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RELVX vs. RMLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RELVX

RELVX Risk / Return Rank: 64
RELVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
RELVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
RELVX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
RELVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
RELVX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

RMLVX

RMLVX Risk / Return Rank: 60
RMLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
RMLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
RMLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
RMLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
RMLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RELVX vs. RMLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments LifePoints Equity Growth Strategy Fund (RELVX) and Russell Investments LifePoints Moderate Strategy Fund (RMLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RELVX	RMLVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	2.14	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	3.07	-0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.41	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	2.49	+0.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.36	10.90	+1.47

RELVX vs. RMLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RELVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the RMLVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RELVX and RMLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RELVX vs. RMLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RELVX drawdown since its inception was -66.26%, which is greater than RMLVX's maximum drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RELVX and RMLVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RELVX	RMLVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.26%	-40.56%	-25.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.77%	-5.28%	-3.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.29%	-7.63%	-7.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.53%	-20.83%	-4.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.08%	-20.83%	-13.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.68%	-0.37%	-0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.26%	-6.12%	-11.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	1.20%	+0.80%

Volatility

RELVX vs. RMLVX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments LifePoints Equity Growth Strategy Fund (RELVX) has a higher volatility of 4.19% compared to Russell Investments LifePoints Moderate Strategy Fund (RMLVX) at 2.40%. This indicates that RELVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RELVX	RMLVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.19%	2.40%	+1.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.17%	5.17%	+4.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.29%	6.17%	+5.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.73%	8.03%	+6.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.21%	7.75%	+7.46%

RELVX vs. RMLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RELVX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than RMLVX's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

RELVX vs. RMLVX - Dividend Comparison

RELVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.74%, more than RMLVX's 3.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RELVX Russell Investments LifePoints Equity Growth Strategy Fund	9.74%	10.67%	0.80%	1.15%	5.74%	8.12%	1.67%	3.09%	5.24%	2.47%	1.82%	1.15%
RMLVX Russell Investments LifePoints Moderate Strategy Fund	3.02%	3.10%	1.75%	1.24%	3.84%	10.02%	1.07%	3.80%	4.46%	3.06%	8.20%	14.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RELVX and RMLVX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, RELVX and RMLVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RELVX or RMLVX?

RELVX has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to RMLVX (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RELVX dropped -66.26% vs RMLVX's -40.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RELVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.